Literature DB >> 18343893

Comparative temporal toxicogenomic analysis of TCDD- and TCDF-mediated hepatic effects in immature female C57BL/6 mice.

Alhaji N'Jai1, Darrell R Boverhof, Edward Dere, Lyle D Burgoon, Ying S Tan, J Craig Rowlands, Robert A Budinsky, Kenneth E Stebbins, Timothy R Zacharewski.   

Abstract

Temporal analyses were performed on hepatic tissue from immature female C57BL/6 mice in order to compare the gene expression profiles for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibzofuran (TCDF). Time course studies conducted with a single oral dose of 300 microg/kg TCDF or 30 microg/kg TCDD were used to compare differential gene expression on complementary DNA microarrays containing 13,361 features, representing 8194 genes at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 72, 120, and 168 h. One hundred and ninety-five genes were identified as differentially regulated by TCDF, of which 116 genes were in common with TCDD, with 109 exhibiting comparable expression profiles (correlation coefficients > 0.3). In general, TCDF was less effective in eliciting hepatic vacuolization, and differential gene expression compared with TCDD when given at an equipotent dose based on a toxic equivalence factor (TEF) of 0.1 for TCDF, especially 72-h postadministration. For example, the induction of Cyp1a1 messenger RNA by TCDF was less when compared TCDD. Moreover, TCDF induced less severe hepatocyte cytoplasmic vacuolization consistent with lower lipid accumulations which significantly subsided by 120 and 168 h when compared with TCDD. TCDF-elicited responses correlated with their hepatic tissue levels which gradually decreased between 18 and 168 h. Although both compounds elicited comparable gene expression profiles, especially at early time points, the TCDF responses were generally weaker. Collectively, these results suggest that the weaker TCDF responses could be attributed to differences in pharmacokinetics. However, more comprehensive dose-response studies are required at optimal times for each end point of interest in order to investigate the effect of pharmacokinetic differences on relative potencies that are important in establishing TEFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343893     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  11 in total

1.  Characterization of polybrominated diphenyl ether toxicity in Wistar Han rats and use of liver microarray data for predicting disease susceptibilities.

Authors:  June K Dunnick; A Brix; H Cunny; M Vallant; K R Shockley
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  2,3,7,8-TCDD enhances the sensitivity of mice to concanavalin A immune-mediated liver injury.

Authors:  Aaron M Fullerton; Robert A Roth; Patricia E Ganey
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Comparative metabolomic and genomic analyses of TCDD-elicited metabolic disruption in mouse and rat liver.

Authors:  Agnes L Forgacs; Michael N Kent; Meghan K Makley; Bryan Mets; Nicholas DelRaso; Gary L Jahns; Lyle D Burgoon; Timothy R Zacharewski; Nicholas V Reo
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Acute disruption of bone marrow hematopoiesis by benzo(a)pyrene is selectively reversed by aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated processes.

Authors:  Alhaji U N'jai; Michele C Larsen; Justin R Bushkofsky; Charles J Czuprynski; Colin R Jefcoate
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Automated dose-response analysis and comparative toxicogenomic evaluation of the hepatic effects elicited by TCDD, TCDF, and PCB126 in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Lyle D Burgoon; Daher Ibrahim-Aibo; Ashley R Burg; Andrea W Lee; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Jack R Harkema; J Craig Rowlands; Robert A Budinsky; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  PCB153-elicited hepatic responses in the immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice: comparative toxicogenomic effects of dioxin and non-dioxin-like ligands.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Lyle D Burgoon; Daher Ibrahim-Aibo; Bryan D Mets; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Jack R Harkema; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities.

Authors:  Ivy D Moffat; Paul C Boutros; Hanbo Chen; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Comparative analysis of AhR-mediated TCDD-elicited gene expression in human liver adult stem cells.

Authors:  Suntae Kim; Edward Dere; Lyle D Burgoon; Chia-Cheng Chang; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Toxicogenomic analysis of exposure to TCDD, PCB126 and PCB153: identification of genomic biomarkers of exposure to AhR ligands.

Authors:  Bladimir J Ovando; Corie A Ellison; Chad M Vezina; James R Olson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Toxicogenomic biomarkers for liver toxicity.

Authors:  Naoki Kiyosawa; Yosuke Ando; Sunao Manabe; Takashi Yamoto
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.