Literature DB >> 18343517

Screening for motor coordination challenges in children using teacher ratings of physical ability and activity.

Brent E Faught1, John Cairney, John Hay, Scott Veldhuizen, Cheryl Missiuna, Cristina A Spironello.   

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of a teacher-based rating scale called the teacher estimation of activity form (TEAF) to screen for developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in children. A random selection of 15 of 75 schools from the District School Board of Niagara in Ontario, Canada was chosen for this study. Every consented child in Grade 4 (n=502) was evaluated for probable DCD (pDCD) in school using the short form Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency (BOTMP-SF). Each student also completed the children's self perceptions of adequacy in and predilection toward physical activity (CSAPPA) scale, participation questionnaire, and Léger 20-meter shuttle run, and had their height and weight measured. The 27 children (5.1%) who scored below the 5th percentile on BOTMP-SF were designated as pDCD cases and the 475 children who scored above the 5th percentile served as controls. Results showed that mean TEAF scores were significantly lower for pDCD children than controls (p<.001). Total TEAF scores ranging from 28 to 32 were preferred in maintaining good sensitivity (.74, 95% CI=.55-.87 to .85, 95% CI=.68-.94). The area under the ROC curve was .77 (95% CI, .68-.86) for the TEAF total score, and some individual items performed approximately as well as the full scale. The TEAF was positively correlated with measures of physical activity and fitness. The TEAF appears to be an effective tool in screening for DCD, particularly in a population setting. Considering the brevity of the TEAF and the discriminative power of individual items, this instrument would be effective in an abbreviated version.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343517     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  6 in total

1. 

Authors:  Laurence Lachapelle-Neveu; Camille Carrier; Marianne Fink-Mercier; Maxime Larivière; Catherine Ruest; Isabelle Demers; Désirée B Maltais; Chantal Camden
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Sleep difficulties and obesity among preadolescents.

Authors:  Jian Liu; John Hay; Divya Joshi; Brent E Faught; Terry Wade; John Cairney
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

3.  Motor Development and Physical Activity: A Longitudinal Discordant Twin-Pair Study.

Authors:  Sari Aaltonen; Antti Latvala; Richard J Rose; Lea Pulkkinen; Urho M Kujala; Jaakko Kaprio; Karri Silventoinen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Suspected motor problems and low preference for active play in childhood are associated with physical inactivity and low fitness in adolescence.

Authors:  Marko T Kantomaa; Jarno Purtsi; Anja M Taanila; Jouko Remes; Helena Viholainen; Pauli Rintala; Timo Ahonen; Tuija H Tammelin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ceiling effects in the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) suggest that non-parametric scoring methods are required.

Authors:  Blandine French; Nicole J Sycamore; Hannah L McGlashan; Caroline C V Blanchard; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties - a systematic review.

Authors:  P Asunta; H Viholainen; T Ahonen; P Rintala
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.125

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.