Literature DB >> 18343449

The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: an anatomical concept and its physiological correlate.

Mamdouh M Koraitim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anatomy of the male urethral sphincter has not been stable since it was first described more than 150 years ago. Although 18th and 19th century historical descriptions of the urethral sphincter are most accurate and comprehensive, modern textbooks lack details and include inaccuracies and misleading illustrations. This is an attempt to achieve a revised concept of the male urethral sphincter complex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough review of the English literature in the last 100 years, and of pertinent Germinal publications and textbooks of the 19th and 20th centuries was done. Also, we reviewed urodynamic findings in male patients in whom the urethral sphincters had been expectedly damaged in the proximal or distal part by surgery during the last 20 years.
RESULTS: The current concept of urethral sphincter anatomy does not differ much from that described and illustrated in the 19th century. The disagreement between the historical and recent descriptions is primarily concerned with the cranial extension of the skeletal muscle component and the caudal extension of the smooth muscle component in the urethral wall.
CONCLUSIONS: The male urethral sphincter complex is composed of an inner lissosphincter of smooth muscle and an outer rhabdosphincter of skeletal muscle. It extends in the form of a cylinder around the urethra from the vesical orifice to the perineal membrane. While the rhabdosphincter is most marked around the membranous urethra and becomes gradually less distinct toward the bladder, the lissosphincter has its main part at the vesical orifice and is thinner in its further course in the urethra. The lissosphincter is primarily concerned with the function of continence at rest. On the other hand, the rhabdosphincter has a dual genitourinary function, namely active continence during stress conditions and antegrade semen propulsion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343449     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Normal anatomic relationship between urethral sphincter complex and zones of prostrate in young Chinese males on MRI.

Authors:  Xiangdong Wang; Tieyan Liu; Jing Zhao; Jingyi Sun; Yuefeng Chen; Pengyu Sun; Xuesong Wang; Sheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urodynamics and 3T MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Anne M Suskind; Charlene Neer; Hero Hussain; Jeffrey Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Normal anatomy of urethral sphincter complex in young Chinese males on MRI.

Authors:  Xiang-dong Wang; Sheng Liu; Li-xin Xiong; Peng-yu Sun; Xue-song Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Bessede; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Atsushi Takenaka; Ash Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Exploration of male urethral sphincter complex using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based fiber-tracking.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Usha Sinha; Vadim Malis; Valmik Bhargava; Kyoko Sakamoto; Mahadevan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: etiology and prevention.

Authors:  Kimberley Hoyland; Nikhil Vasdev; Ahmed Abrof; Gregory Boustead
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

7.  Morphological analysis of the urethral muscle of the male pig with relevance to urinary continence and micturition.

Authors:  Luisa Ragionieri; Francesca Ravanetti; Ferdinando Gazza; Maddalena Botti; Ana Ivanovska; Antonio Cacchioli
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; John O L DeLancey; Hero K Hussain; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Jerilyn M Latini; Anne P Cameron
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 9.  Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Reynaldo G Gómez; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.