Literature DB >> 18343257

Cardiovascular outcomes among patients newly initiating atorvastatin or simvastatin therapy: a large database analysis of managed care plans in the United States.

JoAnne M Foody1, Amie T Joyce, Amy E Rudolph, Larry Z Liu, Joshua S Benner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the results of randomized clinical trials have indicated that statins improve outcomes in patients without cardiovascular disease (CVD), it remains uncertain whether there are differences in efficacy between statins, particularly in clinical practice, where the public health implications could be substantial.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed cardiovascular (CV) outcomes among primary-prevention patients newly initiating therapy with atorvastatin or simvastatin.
METHODS: Using claims data from 92 US managed care plans, we identified new statin users without CVD who initiated atorvastatin (10 or 20 mg) or simvastatin (20 or 40 mg) from January 2003 to September 2005 and were continuously enrolled in a covered plan for > or = 12 months before and > or = 1 month after the initiation of statin therapy. The main outcome was the time to the first CV event (hospitalization related to myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary artery disease; stroke; amaurosis fugax; transient ischemic attack; peripheral or central nervous system vascular disease; or revascularization). Persistence with treatment was calculated in terms of the number of days during follow-up that a patient remained on statin treatment, starting from the date of the first prescription fill to the end of the study or the date at which therapy was discontinued.
RESULTS: A total of 168,973 patients initiating atorvastatin (mean dose, 13.5 mg) and 50,658 patients initiating simvastatin (mean dose, 28.5 mg) were followed for a median of 1.5 years. Atorvastatin patients were significantly more persistent with treatment than simvastatin patients (median treatment duration, 158 vs 124 days, respectively; P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, type of health plan, payer type, geographic region, calendar year of statin initiation, physician specialty, comorbidities, concomitant therapies, and total direct health care costs in the year before statin initiation, use of atorvastatin was associated with significantly fewer CV events compared with use of simvastatin (hazard ratio = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In these patients without CVD, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg was associated with a significantly lower risk of CV events compared with simvastatin 20 or 40 mg. Further studies are required to determine whether differences in persistence, achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, or other factors contribute to these differences in outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343257     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  9 in total

1.  The Role of Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention: What is the Evidence?

Authors:  Rebecca Rudominer Ascunce; Jeffrey S Berger; Howard S Weintraub; Arthur Schwartzbard
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Hyperlipidemia and primary prevention of stroke: does risk factor identification and reduction really work?

Authors:  Ariane Lewis; Alan Segal
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Cardiovascular and economic outcomes after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin vs simvastatin in an employed population.

Authors:  Ross J Simpson; James Signorovitch; Howard Birnbaum; Jasmina Ivanova; Cristina Connolly; Yohanne Kidolezi; Andreas Kuznik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Selective prescribing of simvastatin and atorvastatin by patient characteristics at treatment initiation over a 7-year period in Finland.

Authors:  Heli Halava; Arja Helin-Salmivaara; Jouni Junnila; Risto Huupponen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Sequential cohort design applying propensity score matching to analyze the comparative effectiveness of atorvastatin and simvastatin in preventing cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Arja Helin-Salmivaara; Piia Lavikainen; Emma Aarnio; Risto Huupponen; Maarit Jaana Korhonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of background statin therapy on glycemic response and cardiovascular events following initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a large UK cohort study.

Authors:  Uchenna Anyanwagu; Jil Mamza; Richard Donnelly; Iskandar Idris
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  The case for developing publicly-accessible datasets for health services research in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Authors:  Shadi S Saleh; Mohamad S Alameddine; Fadi El-Jardali
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Comparative effectiveness of rosuvastatin versus simvastatin in primary prevention among new users: a cohort study in the French national health insurance database.

Authors:  Anke Neumann; Géric Maura; Alain Weill; Philippe Ricordeau; François Alla; Hubert Allemand
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Utilization and adherence to guideline-recommended lipid-lowering therapy at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Khalid A Alburikan; Rayah M Asiri; Abduallah M Alhammad; Amer A Abuelizz; Ghada A Bawazeer; Mohammed H Aljawadi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.