Literature DB >> 18342651

Self-described impact of noncompliance among users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method.

Iñaki Lete1, José Luis Doval, Ezequiel Pérez-Campos, Roberto Lertxundi, Marta Correa, Esther de la Viuda, María Angeles Gómez, José Vicente González, María Teresa Martínez, Nicolás Mendoza, Javier Robledo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of factors related to the user and the method affect contraceptive compliance. STUDY
DESIGN: This cross-sectional multicenter study was designed to assess self-described impact of noncompliant behavior among 26,250 typical users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method who consulted their physicians for control visits. A self-administered questionnaire was completed.
RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of women used the pill, 23% the vaginal ring and 12% the transdermal patch. Noncompliant behavior (missing/delays in taking/application, insertion or removal of the pill/skin patch/vaginal ring) was recorded in 71% of pill users, 32% of patch users and 21.6% of vaginal ring users (p<.0001). Emergency contraception was requested by 14% of pill users, 11% of patch users and 6.3% of ring users. About 40% of women in all groups called or visited a physician. Seventy percent of women continued to have active sex life, and 60% used an additional contraceptive method. Noncompliant behavior negatively affected work activities and/or couple relationships in 10-20% of cases. More than 50% of women reported they were worried and about 20% were scared due to inconsistent use of the contraceptive method. After filling out the questionnaire, 64.7% of pill users continued to prefer the pill, 61.7% of patch users preferred the patch and 96.6% of women using the vaginal ring preferred the ring.
CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliant behavior had noticeable effects on emotional well-being, prompted request for physicians' advice, and use of emergency contraception. Despite recognition of problems associated with inconsistent use, women tended to prefer the currently used contraceptive method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18342651     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  11 in total

1.  Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey.

Authors:  David J Hooper
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  [Accesibility and tolerability on the use of subcutaneous hormone implants in a socially excluded population].

Authors:  Vanessa Domínguez Úbeda; Patricia Avila Pecci; María Josefa Espinaco Garrido; José Román Oliver
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 3.  Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; David A Grimes; Maria F Gallo; Laurie L Stockton; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-04-30

4.  Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice?

Authors:  Mireille Merckx; Gilbert G Donders; Pascale Grandjean; Tine Van de Sande; Steven Weyers
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Adherence with ethinylestradiol 20 μg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen supported by the use of a digital tablet dispenser with or without acoustic alarm: an open-label, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Jörg Elliesen; Anna Maria Paoletti; Anja Walzer; Bodo Kirsch
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-05

6.  Fear of becoming pregnant among female healthcare students in Spain.

Authors:  Felipe Navarro-Cremades; Antonio Palazón-Bru; María Del Ángel Arroyo-Sebastián; Luis Gómez-Pérez; Armina Sepehri; Salvador Martínez-Pérez; Dolores Marhuenda-Amorós; María Mercedes Rizo-Baeza; Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Evaluation of factors associated with noncompliance in users of combined hormonal contraceptive methods: a cross-sectional study: results from the MIA study.

Authors:  Txantón Martínez-Astorquiza-Ortiz de Zarate; Teresa Díaz-Martín; Txantón Martínez-Astorquiza-Corral
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Adherence to a flexible extended regimen for oral hormonal contraception provided in blister packaging compared with an adherence-supporting digital tablet dispenser: historical comparison of data from two clinical studies.

Authors:  Jörg Elliesen; Dietmar Trummer
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 9.  Contraception for women with epilepsy: counseling, choices, and concerns.

Authors:  Arne Reimers
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-04-19

10.  Real-World Evidence on the Effect of Missing an Oral Contraceptive Dose: Analysis of Internet Search Engine Queries.

Authors:  Irit Hochberg; Sharon Orshalimy; Elad Yom-Tov
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.