OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the level of platelet inhibition achieved by 3 different clopidogrel loading regimens in patients undergoing elective angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention when appropriate. BACKGROUND: Optimal platelet inhibition is a key therapeutic goal for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although 600 mg has been described as the maximum absorbed dose when given as a single bolus, the effects of 2 boluses given 24 h apart have not been described. METHODS:Patients (n = 148) were randomly assigned to one of 3 regimens: Group A, clopidogrel 300 mg the day before (>or=15 h) + 75 mg the morning of the procedure; Group B, clopidogrel 600 mg the morning of the procedure (>or=2 h); and Group C, clopidogrel 600 mg the day before (>or=15 h) and 600 mg the morning of the procedure (>or=2 h). Blood samples were obtained at baseline and immediately before angiography. Peak and late platelet aggregation were measured in platelet rich plasma, with researchers blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: There was a consistent difference favoring Group C in all aggregation parameters. Percent inhibition in Groups A, B, and C was 31.4%, 29.0%, and 49.5%, respectively, for peak aggregation (5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate; p < 0.0001) and 54.1%, 57.7%, and 81.1%, respectively, for late aggregation (p < 0.0001). Similar striking reductions were observed when 20 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate was used. All comparisons between Group C and the other 2 groups were statistically significant, and those between Groups A and B were not. CONCLUSIONS:Clopidogrel 600-mg double bolus achieves greater platelet inhibition than conventional single loading doses.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the level of platelet inhibition achieved by 3 different clopidogrel loading regimens in patients undergoing elective angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention when appropriate. BACKGROUND: Optimal platelet inhibition is a key therapeutic goal for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although 600 mg has been described as the maximum absorbed dose when given as a single bolus, the effects of 2 boluses given 24 h apart have not been described. METHODS:Patients (n = 148) were randomly assigned to one of 3 regimens: Group A, clopidogrel 300 mg the day before (>or=15 h) + 75 mg the morning of the procedure; Group B, clopidogrel 600 mg the morning of the procedure (>or=2 h); and Group C, clopidogrel 600 mg the day before (>or=15 h) and 600 mg the morning of the procedure (>or=2 h). Blood samples were obtained at baseline and immediately before angiography. Peak and late platelet aggregation were measured in platelet rich plasma, with researchers blinded to treatment allocation. RESULTS: There was a consistent difference favoring Group C in all aggregation parameters. Percent inhibition in Groups A, B, and C was 31.4%, 29.0%, and 49.5%, respectively, for peak aggregation (5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate; p < 0.0001) and 54.1%, 57.7%, and 81.1%, respectively, for late aggregation (p < 0.0001). Similar striking reductions were observed when 20 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate was used. All comparisons between Group C and the other 2 groups were statistically significant, and those between Groups A and B were not. CONCLUSIONS:Clopidogrel 600-mg double bolus achieves greater platelet inhibition than conventional single loading doses.
Authors: Serkan Cay; Goksel Cagirci; Sinan Aydogdu; Yucel Balbay; Nihat Sen; Orhan Maden; Ahmet D Demir; Ali R Erbay Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: M Urooj Zafar; Borja Ibáñez; Brian G Choi; David A Vorchheimer; Antonio Piñero; Xiaoping Jin; Raman K Sharma; Juan J Badimon Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: M Urooj Zafar; Donald A Smith; Usman Baber; Samantha Sartori; Kevin Chen; David W Lam; Carlos A Linares-Koloffon; Juan Rey-Mendoza; Gustavo Jimenez Britez; Gines Escolar; Valentin Fuster; Juan J Badimon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Ki Hong Lee; Myung Ho Jeong; Youngkeun Ahn; Myeong Chan Cho; Chong Jin Kim; Young Jo Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 2.153