BACKGROUND: Most errors in laboratory medicine are preanalytical in nature. In the present study, we aimed to survey preanalytical steps in venous blood sampling, prior to actual sample collection. These steps included test-request management and test-tube labelling, as well as information search procedures. METHODS: Venous blood sampling staff (n=314, response rate 94%) in hospital wards and laboratories completed a questionnaire related to clinical chemistry testing. RESULTS: Instructions for test-request management and test-tube labelling were not always followed. For example, only 66% of the ward staff reported always checking the test-request if someone else completed it, compared to 90% of the laboratory staff (p=0.003). As few as 16% of the ward staff reported desirable practices regarding test-tube labelling, compared to 100% of the laboratory staff (p<0.001). Furthermore, 18% of the ward staff reported always using online manuals (the only source of updated information), compared to 63% of the laboratory staff (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a substantial risk of preanalytical error in test-request management, test-tube labelling, and information search practices, particularly in the wards. Our findings thus underscore the importance of quality control in venous blood sampling, in order to increase patient safety in modern health care.
BACKGROUND: Most errors in laboratory medicine are preanalytical in nature. In the present study, we aimed to survey preanalytical steps in venous blood sampling, prior to actual sample collection. These steps included test-request management and test-tube labelling, as well as information search procedures. METHODS: Venous blood sampling staff (n=314, response rate 94%) in hospital wards and laboratories completed a questionnaire related to clinical chemistry testing. RESULTS: Instructions for test-request management and test-tube labelling were not always followed. For example, only 66% of the ward staff reported always checking the test-request if someone else completed it, compared to 90% of the laboratory staff (p=0.003). As few as 16% of the ward staff reported desirable practices regarding test-tube labelling, compared to 100% of the laboratory staff (p<0.001). Furthermore, 18% of the ward staff reported always using online manuals (the only source of updated information), compared to 63% of the laboratory staff (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a substantial risk of preanalytical error in test-request management, test-tube labelling, and information search practices, particularly in the wards. Our findings thus underscore the importance of quality control in venous blood sampling, in order to increase patient safety in modern health care.
Authors: Gabriel Lima-Oliveira; Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Luca Salvagno; Marise Danielle Raulino Campelo; Katharyne Soares Adala Tajra; Flavio dos Santos Gomes; Carlos David Valentim; Sylvio José Colonna Romano; Geraldo Picheth; Gian Cesare Guidi Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Daniel Kimani; Rachel Kamau; Renuka Gadde; Dejana Selenic; Stephen Maina; Lawrence Marum; Gao Hongjiang; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Marfin; Jane Mwangi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Adolfo Romero-Arana; Blanca Prieto-Callejero; Javier Fagundo-Rivera; Juan Gómez-Salgado; Macarena Romero-Martín; Carlos Ruiz-Frutos; Adolfo Romero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karin Bölenius; Marie Lindkvist; Christine Brulin; Kjell Grankvist; Karin Nilsson; Johan Söderberg Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Karin Nilsson; Christina Juthberg; Johan Söderberg; Karin Bölenius; Kjell Grankvist; Christine Brulin; Marie Lindkvist Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.655