Literature DB >> 18341716

Retrospective study comparing six- and twelve-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer.

Motoi Tobiume1, Yoshiaki Yamada, Kogenta Nakamura, Nobuaki Honda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety and efficacy of the 12-core biopsy with those of the conventional systematic 6-core biopsy with PSA levels between 4.1 and 20.0 ng/mL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 428 patients who underwent a 6-core biopsy and 128 patients who underwent a 12-core biopsy. Biopsies were performed transrectally under ultrasound guidance. The 12-core biopsy scheme involved obtaining 6 far lateral cores.
RESULTS: For patients with PSA level between 4.1 and 10.1 ng/mL, 47 of the 265 patients who underwent 6-core biopsy and 32 of the 91 patients who underwent a12-core biopsy were diagnosed with prostate cancer (p = 0.0006). Among the patients with a PSA level between 10.1 and 20.0 ng/mL, 48 of 163 patients who underwent the 6-core biopsy and 16 of 37 patients who underwent the 12-core biopsy were diagnosed with prostate cancer (p = 0.0606). Three of the 95 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer through the 6-core biopsy and 12 of the 48 patients who were diagnosed through the 12-core biopsy had cancer located in the anterior apex. The 12-core biopsy increased the diagnostic rate in the apex (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in incidence of complications.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that the 12-core biopsy is a safe and more effective procedure for increasing the diagnostic rate of prostate cancer than the 6-core biopsy in patients with PSA level between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/mL, and the most useful anatomical area to be added was found to be cores from the anterior apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18341716     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000100003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  4 in total

1.  Six-core versus twelve-core prostate biopsy: a retrospective study comparing accuracy, oncological outcomes and safety.

Authors:  W Mohammed; N F Davis; S Elamin; P Ahern; C M Brady; P Sweeney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Is there a role for body mass index in the assessment of prostate cancer risk on biopsy?

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Norma S Ketchum; Phyllis J Goodman; Eric A Klein; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal Ultrasonography; The Optimal Number of Cores Regarding Cancer Detection Rate and Complications.

Authors:  Mahyar Ghafoori; Meysam Velayati; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Madjid Shakiba; Manijeh Alavi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

4.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: an extended approach to diagnose transition zone prostate tumors.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Yao; Li-Ling Zou; Rong Wu; Le-Hang Guo; Guang Xu; Juan Xie; Pei Li; Shuai Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.