Literature DB >> 18341415

Laser-assisted anterior cervical corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for cervical myelopathic patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Sang-Ho Lee1, Yong Ahn, June Ho Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study reports on the comparative results of a series of patients with multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) who were treated with laser-assisted anterior corpectomy or laminoplasty.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients (21 patients with anterior corpectomy and 27 patients with laminoplasty) with cervical OPLL involvement of three or more vertebral bodies were retrospectively reviewed. Both pre- and postoperatively neurological status was graded according to the Nurick grading system. The anteroposterior (AP) diameter change at the narrowest part of the spinal canal, the change in the regional and the overall cervical Cobb's angle, and the change in cervical range of motion (ROM) were all measured. The mean follow-up periods were 21.8 mo and 29.1 mo for the corpectomy and laminoplasty patients, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean changes in the pre- to postoperative Nurick grades were 1.9 for the corpectomy group and 1 for the laminoplasty group (p < 0.05). The mean changes in the pre- to postoperative spinal canal AP diameters were 9.1 mm and 4.11 mm, respectively, for the corpectomy group and the laminoplasty group (p < 0.05). The mean changes of the regional Cobb's angle were 1.7 degrees and -3.1 degrees (p = 0.06), and the mean changes of the overall cervical Cobb's angle were 1.1 degrees and -1.6 degrees , respectively, for the corpectomy group and the laminoplasty group (p > 0.05). The changes in the cervical degree of ROM were -19.6 degrees and -19.7 degrees , respectively, for the corpectomy group and the laminoplasty group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct decompression of the spinal cord by laser-assisted anterior cervical corpectomy was shown to be a better surgical option on long-term follow-up, yielding more recovery of neurological deficits, achieving adequate decompression of the spinal canal, and preventing the development of regional kyphosis at the operated level of the spine, in patients with multilevel cervical OPLL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18341415     DOI: 10.1089/pho.2007.2110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg        ISSN: 1549-5418            Impact factor:   2.796


  11 in total

Review 1.  Anterior surgery in selective patients with massive ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine: technical note.

Authors:  Xinwei Wang; Deyu Chen; Wen Yuan; Ying Zhang; Jianru Xiao; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Yu-Sheng Huang; Jian-Ting Chen; Zhao-Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Wen Xu; Tao Cheng; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy and Microscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Thoracic Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Junseok Bae; Jisang Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

Review 5.  Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuzhou Liu; Shaoxiong Min; Hui Zhang; Zhilai Zhou; Hehui Wang; Anmin Jin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rongqing Qin; Xiaoqing Chen; Pin Zhou; Ming Li; Jie Hao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Microscope Enhanced the Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Surgery for Managing Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Mingxiao Sun; Lili Kong; Zhaofu Jiang; Liming Li; Bing Lu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-24

8.  Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis for last decade.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xiao-Ming Tian; Si-Kai Liu; Hui Wang; Ying-Ze Zhang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The Clinical Implications and Complications of Anterior Versus Posterior Surgery for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Hwan Kim; Chang-Hyun Lee; Young San Ko; Seung Heon Yang; Chi Heon Kim; Sung Bae Park; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

10.  Comparison of anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weijun Liu; Ling Hu; Po-Hsin Chou; Ming Liu; Wusheng Kan; Junwen Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.