Literature DB >> 1834129

Socioeconomic status and cancer mortality and incidence in Melbourne.

J Williams1, C Clifford, J Hopper, G Giles.   

Abstract

Data were obtained for all deaths registered between 1979-1983, and for all new cancers recorded at the Victorian Cancer Registry between 1982-1983, in residents of Melbourne. A socioeconomic status (SES) measure had been produced for each local government area (LGA) by principal components analysis of sociodemographic variables recorded at the 1981 census. A SES score from 1 to 10 was assigned to each death and cancer. Population data from the census were similarly scored. Age standardised rates for all cause mortality, for mortality from all causes other than cancer and for both incidence and mortality of total cancers, cancer of the stomach, colon, rectum, lung, female breast, cervix, uterus, prostate and bladder, and for melanoma, lymphoma and leukaemia were analysed as a function of SES decile using weighted linear regression. Despite the limited number of years of data and the misclassification of the SES score, analyses showed there were inequitable distributions of mortality, and of some major cancers, across social strata in Melbourne during the early 1980s. The incidences of cancer of the breast, colon, prostate and melanoma were all positively associated with SES, while the incidences of cancer of the stomach, lung and cervix demonstrated negative SES gradients. For cancers where incidence showed a significant SES gradient there was a similar SES gradient with mortality. These patterns are consistent with the literature and implicate SES differences in education and access to services. Implications for health policy are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834129     DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90147-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  18 in total

1.  Access to care and outcomes for neuroendocrine tumours: does socioeconomic status matter?

Authors:  J Hallet; N G Coburn; S Singh; K Beyfuss; S Koujanian; N Liu; C H L Law
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected].

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Common cancers in the elderly.

Authors:  J Hansen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Socio-economic status and survival from breast cancer for young, Australian, urban women.

Authors:  Katherine I Morley; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Socioeconomic status and stomach cancer incidence in men: results from The Netherlands Cohort Study.

Authors:  A J van Loon; R A Goldbohm; P A van den Brandt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Occupational physical activity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey.

Authors:  M Dosemeci; R B Hayes; R Vetter; R N Hoover; M Tucker; K Engin; M Unsal; A Blair
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Cancer outlook: an African perspective.

Authors:  A R Walker
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival: The Mediating Effects of Macro-Social Context and Social Network Factors.

Authors:  Ganga Vijayasiri; Yamile Molina; Ifeanyi Beverly Chukwudozie; Silvia Tejeda; Heather A Pauls; Garth H Rauscher; Richard T Campbell; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2018

9.  Cancer mortality by educational level in the city of Barcelona.

Authors:  E Fernandez; C Borrell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.