INTRODUCTION: Sixty percent of India's HIV cases occur in rural residents. Despite government policy to expand antenatal HIV screening and prevention of maternal-to-child transmission (PMTCT), little is known about HIV testing among rural women during pregnancy. METHODS: Between January and March 2006, a cross-sectional sample of 400 recently pregnant women from rural Maharashtra was administered a questionnaire regarding HIV awareness, risk, and history of antenatal HIV testing. RESULTS: Thirteen women (3.3%) reported receiving antenatal HIV testing. Neither antenatal care utilization nor history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms influenced odds of receiving HIV testing. Women who did not receive HIV testing, compared with women who did, were 95% less likely to have received antenatal HIV counseling (odds ratio = 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.17) and 80% less aware of an existing HIV testing facility (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.04 to 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Despite measurable HIV prevalence, high antenatal care utilization, and STI symptom history, recently pregnant rural Indian women report low HIV testing. Barriers to HIV testing during pregnancy include lack of discussion by antenatal care providers and lack of awareness of existing testing services. Provider-initiated HIV counseling and testing during pregnancy would optimize HIV prevention for women throughout rural India.
INTRODUCTION: Sixty percent of India's HIV cases occur in rural residents. Despite government policy to expand antenatal HIV screening and prevention of maternal-to-child transmission (PMTCT), little is known about HIV testing among rural women during pregnancy. METHODS: Between January and March 2006, a cross-sectional sample of 400 recently pregnant women from rural Maharashtra was administered a questionnaire regarding HIV awareness, risk, and history of antenatal HIV testing. RESULTS: Thirteen women (3.3%) reported receiving antenatal HIV testing. Neither antenatal care utilization nor history of sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms influenced odds of receiving HIV testing. Women who did not receive HIV testing, compared with women who did, were 95% less likely to have received antenatal HIV counseling (odds ratio = 0.05, 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.17) and 80% less aware of an existing HIV testing facility (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.04 to 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Despite measurable HIV prevalence, high antenatal care utilization, and STI symptom history, recently pregnant rural Indian women report low HIV testing. Barriers to HIV testing during pregnancy include lack of discussion by antenatal care providers and lack of awareness of existing testing services. Provider-initiated HIV counseling and testing during pregnancy would optimize HIV prevention for women throughout rural India.
Authors: Adeline Nyamathi; Alecia Y Hanson; Benissa E Salem; Sanjeev Sinha; Kalyan K Ganguly; Barbara Leake; Kartik Yadav; Mary Marfisee Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Adeline M Nyamathi; Sanjeev Sinha; Kalyan K Ganguly; Ravi Raj William; Anisa Heravian; Padma Ramakrishnan; Barbara Greengold; Maria Ekstrand; Pantangi Venkata Rama Rao Journal: Health Care Women Int Date: 2011-04
Authors: Margaret Carrel; Mark Janko; Melchior Kashamuka Mwandagalirwa; Camille Morgan; Franck Fwamba; Jérémie Muwonga; Antoinette K Tshefu; Steven Meshnick; Michael Emch Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Mealiny Sokun Sau; Maya Balamane; Mark Lurie; Joseph Harwell; Emily Welle; Chhivun Mean; Susan Cu-Uvin Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2015-09-03
Authors: Rashida A Ferrand; Caroline Trigg; Tsitsi Bandason; Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu; Stanley Mungofa; Kusum Nathoo; Diana M Gibb; Frances M Cowan; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 9.308