Literature DB >> 18340035

Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others.

Robbie M Sutton1, Karen M Douglas, Katie Wilkin, Tracey J Elder, Jennifer M Cole, Sofia Stathi.   

Abstract

The present studies examine why people think the world is more just to themselves than to others generally. Beliefs in justice for the self were uniquely associated with psychological adjustment, consistent with the theoretical motive to believe in justice for the self (Studies 1 and 2). However, this "justice motive" did not appear to affect the relative strength of justice beliefs. Instead, self-other differences in justice beliefs appeared to reflect objective assessments of the justice received by various demographics. Undergraduates believed the world to be more just to themselves than to others but not their undergraduate peers specifically (Study 1). Participants of both genders believed the world to be more just to men, and to themselves, than to women (Study 2). Women did not exempt themselves individually from injustice but believed, similar to men, that undergraduate women receive as much justice as men (Study 3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18340035     DOI: 10.1177/0146167207312526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  6 in total

1.  Justice for all? Beliefs about justice for self and others and telomere length in African Americans.

Authors:  Todd Lucas; Jacqueline Woerner; Jennifer Pierce; Douglas A Granger; Jue Lin; Elissa S Epel; Shervin Assari; Mark A Lumley
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2018-07-30

2.  Time frame and justice motive: future perspective moderates the adaptive function of general belief in a just world.

Authors:  Michael Shengtao Wu; Robbie M Sutton; Xiaodan Yan; Chan Zhou; Yiwen Chen; Zhuohong Zhu; Buxin Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Belief in a just what? Demystifying just world beliefs by distinguishing sources of justice.

Authors:  Katherine Stroebe; Tom Postmes; Susanne Täuber; Alwin Stegeman; Melissa-Sue John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Catastrophizing Mediates the Relationship Between the Personal Belief in a Just World and Pain Outcomes Among Chronic Pain Support Group Attendees.

Authors:  Joanna L McParland; Christina Knussen
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2016-01-12

5.  The Role of Just World Beliefs in Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Antonia Mariss; Nina Reinhardt; Simon Schindler
Journal:  Soc Justice Res       Date:  2022-02-17

6.  Institutional Trust as a Protective Factor during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Li; Yijia Sun; Jiaqi Jing; Enna Wang
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.