Literature DB >> 18340004

Caprylic acid supplemented in feed reduces enteric Campylobacter jejuni colonization in ten-day-old broiler chickens.

F Solis de Los Santos1, A M Donoghue, K Venkitanarayanan, M L Dirain, I Reyes-Herrera, P J Blore, D J Donoghue.   

Abstract

Campylobacter is one of the leading causes of human foodborne illness in the United States, and epidemiological evidence indicates that poultry and poultry products are a significant source of human Campylobacter infections. Reducing Campylobacter in the intestinal tract would reduce contamination of poultry products and eggs. Caprylic acid, an 8-carbon medium-chain fatty acid has been shown to be bactericidal against several pathogenic bacteria. It has, however, not been tested in the control of Campylobacter in chickens. Four trials were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of caprylic acid against cecal Campylobacter jejuni colonization in 10-d-old chicks. In the first 2 trials, day-of-hatch chicks (n=40 per trial) were assigned to negative controls (no Campylobacter, no caprylic acid), positive controls (Campylobacter, no caprylic acid), and a low (0.7%) and a high (1.4%) dose of caprylic acid supplemented in regular chick starter feed (n=10 chicks/treatment). Two more trials were carried out to evaluate a wider range of caprylic acid doses on cecal Campylobacter counts, in which day-of-hatch chicks (n=90 per trial) were assigned to 9 treatments: negative controls (no Campylobacter, no caprylic acid) and caprylic acid doses of 0 (positive controls), 0.35, 0.525, 0.7, 0.875, 1.05, 1.225, and 1.4% (n=10 chicks/treatment). Except for the negative controls, chicks were orally gavaged with approximately 1 x 10(6) cfu Campylobacter on d 3. On d 10, cecal contents were collected and Campylobacter concentrations were determined in each trial. In all 4 trials, the 0.7% dose of caprylic acid consistently reduced Campylobacter content counts compared with the positive control. In trials 3 and 4, doses less than 1.05% consistently reduced cecal Campylobacter content in both trials. At the higher doses, caprylic acid reduced feed consumption and body weight, but did not affect feed conversion when compared with the positive controls. These data suggest that low-dose supplementation with caprylic acid in feed may reduce Campylobacter colonization in young chickens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18340004     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract of non-ruminants: influence of fermented feeds and fermentable carbohydrates.

Authors:  A T Niba; J D Beal; A C Kudi; P H Brooks
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Therapeutic supplementation of caprylic acid in feed reduces Campylobacter jejuni colonization in broiler chicks.

Authors:  F Solis de los Santos; A M Donoghue; K Venkitanarayanan; I Reyes-Herrera; J H Metcalf; M L Dirain; V F Aguiar; P J Blore; D J Donoghue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of Dietary Coconut Oil as a Medium-chain Fatty Acid Source on Performance, Carcass Composition and Serum Lipids in Male Broilers.

Authors:  Jianhong Wang; Xiaoxiao Wang; Juntao Li; Yiqiang Chen; Wenjun Yang; Liying Zhang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity and Campylobacter spp. Loads in Broilers Reared under Free Range Conditions.

Authors:  Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Adeline Huneau-Salaün; Fabrizio A Tatone; Fabien Skiba; Maxime Quentin; Ségolène Quesne; Typhaine Poezevara; Marianne Chemaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Lauric acid as feed additive - An approach to reducing Campylobacter spp. in broiler meat.

Authors:  Katrin Zeiger; Johanna Popp; André Becker; Julia Hankel; Christian Visscher; Guenter Klein; Diana Meemken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of gut microbiota and the effect of lauric acid against necrotic enteritis in Clostridium perfringens and Eimeria side-by-side challenge model.

Authors:  Wen-Yuan Yang; Yuejia Lee; Hsinyi Lu; Chung-Hsi Chou; Chinling Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of Antibiotic Resistance, Ecology, Dissemination, and Mitigation in U.S. Broiler Poultry Systems.

Authors:  Yichao Yang; Amanda J Ashworth; Cammy Willett; Kimberly Cook; Abhinav Upadhyay; Phillip R Owens; Steven C Ricke; Jennifer M DeBruyn; Philip A Moore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Dietary fatty acids and immune response to food-borne bacterial infections.

Authors:  Lisa M Harrison; Kannan V Balan; Uma S Babu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Essential oils as alternatives to antibiotics in swine production.

Authors:  Faith A Omonijo; Liju Ni; Joshua Gong; Qi Wang; Ludovic Lahaye; Chengbo Yang
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-09-18

10.  The Effects of Different Oil Sources on Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Carcass Traits, Biochemical, Immunological, Antioxidant, and Morphometric Responses of Broiler Chicks.

Authors:  Youssef A Attia; Mohammed A Al-Harthi; Hayam M Abo El-Maaty
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.