BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding techniques, indications, and outcomes for sentinel lymph node biopsy in pediatric patients with sarcomas and carcinomas. METHODS: A retrospective 10-year review was conducted, with Institutional Review Board waiver, of the pathology, lymphoscintigraphy, and clinical records for all pediatric patients selected to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy at a major cancer center. RESULTS: Thirty-one sentinel lymph node biopsies were performed in 30 pediatric patients (median age, 12 years; range, 2-21 years). With the administration of technetium 99m sulfur colloid, sentinel lymph nodes were identified preoperatively in 30 of 31 cases, and intraoperatively in the remaining case. Radiotracer alone was used in 13 of 31 cases but was supplemented with isosulfan blue dye in the remaining 18 cases. There were no complications. Positive sentinel lymph nodes occurred in 1 of 9 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and in 2 of 5 patients with breast cancer, and in both of these diseases the sentinel lymph node results helped guide treatment decisions. No other patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes, and among those with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas there were no lymph node basin recurrences despite a lack of lymph node basin irradiation or formal lymph node dissection. The median follow-up was 48 months (range, 0-111 months). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for pediatric soft-tissue tumors can be performed safely, and the results can alter treatment decisions both for children with rhabdomyosarcoma and adolescents with breast cancer. In patients with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma, we observed no positive sentinel lymph nodes and no lymph node basin recurrences; these data should prompt the prospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a modality that might help guide the administration or withholding of regional therapy among pediatric patients with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma.
BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding techniques, indications, and outcomes for sentinel lymph node biopsy in pediatric patients with sarcomas and carcinomas. METHODS: A retrospective 10-year review was conducted, with Institutional Review Board waiver, of the pathology, lymphoscintigraphy, and clinical records for all pediatric patients selected to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy at a major cancer center. RESULTS: Thirty-one sentinel lymph node biopsies were performed in 30 pediatric patients (median age, 12 years; range, 2-21 years). With the administration of technetium 99m sulfur colloid, sentinel lymph nodes were identified preoperatively in 30 of 31 cases, and intraoperatively in the remaining case. Radiotracer alone was used in 13 of 31 cases but was supplemented with isosulfan blue dye in the remaining 18 cases. There were no complications. Positive sentinel lymph nodes occurred in 1 of 9 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and in 2 of 5 patients with breast cancer, and in both of these diseases the sentinel lymph node results helped guide treatment decisions. No other patients had positive sentinel lymph nodes, and among those with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas there were no lymph node basin recurrences despite a lack of lymph node basin irradiation or formal lymph node dissection. The median follow-up was 48 months (range, 0-111 months). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for pediatric soft-tissue tumors can be performed safely, and the results can alter treatment decisions both for children with rhabdomyosarcoma and adolescents with breast cancer. In patients with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma, we observed no positive sentinel lymph nodes and no lymph node basin recurrences; these data should prompt the prospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy as a modality that might help guide the administration or withholding of regional therapy among pediatric patients with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma.
Authors: Trang H La; Suzanne L Wolden; Zheng Su; Corinne Linardic; R Lor Randall; Douglas S Hawkins; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Trang H La; Suzanne L Wolden; David A Rodeberg; Douglas S Hawkins; Kenneth L Brown; James R Anderson; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lalit Parida; Griffin T Morrisson; Amer Shammas; A K M Moinul Hossain; M Beth McCarville; J Ted Gerstle; Martin Charron; Bhaskar N Rao; Barry L Shulkin Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2012-04-22 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754