Literature DB >> 18338701

Green house gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment.

Florian Amlinger1, Stefan Peyr, Carsten Cuhls.   

Abstract

In order to carry out life-cycle assessments as a basis for far-reaching decisions about environmentally sustainable waste treatment, it is important that the input data be reliable and sound. A comparison of the potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with each solid waste treatment option is essential. This paper addresses GHG emissions from controlled composting processes. Some important methodological prerequisites for proper measurement and data interpretation are described, and a common scale and dimension of emission data are proposed so that data from different studies can be compared. A range of emission factors associated with home composting, open windrow composting, encapsulated composting systems with waste air treatment and mechanical biological waste treatment (MBT) are presented from our own investigations as well as from the literature. The composition of source materials along with process management issues such as aeration, mechanical agitation, moisture control and temperature regime are the most important factors controlling methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and ammoniac (NH3) emissions. If ammoniac is not stripped during the initial rotting phase or eliminated by acid scrubber systems, biofiltration of waste air provides only limited GHG mitigation, since additional N2O may be synthesized during the oxidation of NH3, and only a small amount of CH4 degradation occurs in the biofilter. It is estimated that composting contributes very little to national GHG inventories generating only 0.01-0.06% of global emissions. This analysis does not include emissions from preceding or post-treatment activities (such as collection, transport, energy consumption during processing and land spreading), so that for a full emissions account, emissions from these activities would need to be added to an analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338701     DOI: 10.1177/0734242X07088432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag Res


  7 in total

1.  Biofilter with mixture of pine bark and expanded clay as packing material for methane treatment in lab-scale experiment and field-scale implementation.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Cindy Wienke; Claudia Fiencke; Jianbin Guo; Renjie Dong; Eva-Maria Pfeiffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biodegradation of compostable and oxodegradable plastic films by backyard composting and bioaugmentation.

Authors:  Xochitl Quecholac-Piña; Mariel Anel García-Rivera; Rosa María Espinosa-Valdemar; Alethia Vázquez-Morillas; Margarita Beltrán-Villavicencio; Adriana de la Luz Cisneros-Ramos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Addition of zeolite and superphosphate to windrow composting of chicken manure improves fertilizer efficiency and reduces greenhouse gas emission.

Authors:  Shuang Peng; Huijie Li; Qianqian Xu; Xiangui Lin; Yiming Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Qualitative Risk Analysis for Contents of Dry Toilets Used to Produce Novel Recycling Fertilizers.

Authors:  Ariane Krause; Franziska Häfner; Florian Augustin; Kai M Udert
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2021-07-15

5.  Cost-benefit analysis of beach-cast harvest: Closing land-marine nutrient loops in the Baltic Sea region.

Authors:  Tore Söderqvist; Hanna Nathaniel; Daniel Franzén; Frida Franzén; Linus Hasselström; Fredrik Gröndahl; Rajib Sinha; Johanna Stadmark; Åsa Strand; Ida Ingmansson; Sofia Lingegård; Jean-Baptiste Thomas
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co-composted biochar.

Authors:  Claudia I Kammann; Hans-Peter Schmidt; Nicole Messerschmidt; Sebastian Linsel; Diedrich Steffens; Christoph Müller; Hans-Werner Koyro; Pellegrino Conte; Stephen Joseph; Joseph Stephen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Turning Frequency on Ammonia Emission during the Composting of Chicken Manure and Soybean Straw.

Authors:  Qianqian Ma; Yanli Li; Jianming Xue; Dengmiao Cheng; Zhaojun Li
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.