Literature DB >> 18338247

Estrogen regulated gene expression in response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancers: tamoxifen agonist effects dominate in the presence of an aromatase inhibitor.

Djuana M E Harvell1, Jennifer K Richer, Meenakshi Singh, Nicole Spoelstra, Christina Finlayson, Virginia F Borges, Anthony D Elias, Kathryn B Horwitz.   

Abstract

Estrogens (E) and estrogen receptors (ER) are implicated in breast cancer growth and are targets of hormonal therapies. Such therapies commonly use aromatase inhibitors (AI) to block E production, or antiestrogens like tamoxifen (TAM), which targets ER. Here we compare genes in pre-and post-treatment tumor pairs of patients with ER+ tumors, that were treated preoperatively with the AI exemestane alone, or with exemestane plus TAM. The accompanying manuscript shows that tumors from patients treated with AI + TAM responded less well than tumors treated with AI alone. The present manuscript defines the E-signaling mechanisms underlying these differences, and describes genetic differences between hormone responsive versus intrinsically resistant ER+ tumors. Gene expression profiling was performed on paired tumor biopsies of individual patients before treatment, and after 4 months of treatment with AI or AI + TAM. Separately, E and TAM regulated genes were defined using a human breast cancer xenograft model. We demonstrate: (1) that AI alone alters global gene expression approximately 5 times more than AI + TAM, and is 11 times more effective in modifying expression of E regulated genes; (2) among E regulated genes, there is little overlap between AI and AI + TAM treatment groups. AI + TAM preferentially induce genes, like androgen receptors, expressing TAM "E-like" agonist activity, or genes uniquely regulated by TAM. (3) A pre-treatment 25 gene signature of ER+ tumors may predict response or intrinsic resistance to endocrine therapies. We conclude that in the presence of exemestane, the agonist properties of TAM are paradoxically exposed, diminishing the effectiveness of combination therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338247     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9923-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

Review 1.  Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The Androgen Receptor Supports Tumor Progression After the Loss of Ovarian Function in a Preclinical Model of Obesity and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wellberg; L Allyson Checkley; Erin D Giles; Stevi J Johnson; Robera Oljira; Reema Wahdan-Alaswad; Rebecca M Foright; Greg Dooley; Susan M Edgerton; Sonali Jindal; Ginger C Johnson; Jennifer K Richer; Peter Kabos; Ann D Thor; Pepper Schedin; Paul S MacLean; Steven M Anderson
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Cooperative Dynamics of AR and ER Activity in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C D'Amato; Michael A Gordon; Beatrice Babbs; Nicole S Spoelstra; Kiel T Carson Butterfield; Kathleen C Torkko; Vernon T Phan; Valerie N Barton; Thomas J Rogers; Carol A Sartorius; Anthony Elias; Jason Gertz; Britta M Jacobsen; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 4.  Potential of selective estrogen receptor modulators as treatments and preventives of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Surojeet Sengupta; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Genomic signatures of pregnancy-associated breast cancer epithelia and stroma and their regulation by estrogens and progesterone.

Authors:  Djuana M E Harvell; Jihye Kim; Jenean O'Brien; Aik-Choon Tan; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin; Britta M Jacobsen; Kathryn B Horwitz
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  Phase 1b study of orteronel in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Murtuza Rampurwala; Kari B Wisinski; Mark E Burkard; Sima Ehsani; Ruth M O'Regan; Lakeesha Carmichael; KyungMann Kim; Jill Kolesar; Amye J Tevaarwerk
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  FGFR1 underlies obesity-associated progression of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer after estrogen deprivation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wellberg; Peter Kabos; Austin E Gillen; Britta M Jacobsen; Heather M Brechbuhl; Stevi J Johnson; Michael C Rudolph; Susan M Edgerton; Ann D Thor; Steven M Anderson; Anthony Elias; Xi Kathy Zhou; Neil M Iyengar; Monica Morrow; Domenick J Falcone; Omar El-Hely; Andrew J Dannenberg; Carol A Sartorius; Paul S MacLean
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 8.  Harnessing a Different Dependency: How to Identify and Target Androgen Receptor-Positive Versus Quadruple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica L Christenson; Jane B Trepel; Haythem Y Ali; Sunmin Lee; Joel R Eisner; Edwina S Baskin-Bey; Anthony D Elias; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 9.  Steroidogenic cytochrome P450 17A1 structure and function.

Authors:  Sarah D Burris-Hiday; Emily E Scott
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.369

10.  Steroid Hormone Receptor and Infiltrating Immune Cell Status Reveals Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of ESR1-Mutant Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michelle M Williams; Nicole S Spoelstra; Spencer Arnesen; Kathleen I O'Neill; Jessica L Christenson; Jordan Reese; Kathleen C Torkko; Andrew Goodspeed; Emmanuel Rosas; Toru Hanamura; Sharon B Sams; Zheqi Li; Steffi Oesterreich; Rebecca B Riggins; Britta M Jacobsen; Anthony Elias; Jason Gertz; Jennifer K Richer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 13.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.