Literature DB >> 18337651

Temozolomide associated with PEG-interferon in patients with metastatic melanoma: a multicenter prospective phase I/II study.

Bernard Guillot1, Amir Khamari, Didier Cupissol, Michele Delaunay, Christophe Bedane, Brigitte Dreno, Marie Christine Picot, Olivier Dereure.   

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma treatment remains disappointing, and a combined approach by chemotherapy and immunotherapy might increase the response rates through a synergistic action. Accordingly, a clinical trial using oral temozolomide (TMZ) and subcutaneous PEG-interferon alpha-2b (PEG) in patients with metastatic melanoma was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dosage of both drugs and the antitumoral response. A multicenter, prospective, phase I/II study was conducted in 31 metastatic melanoma patients, without cerebral metastasis. Dose escalation was performed according to the modified continual reassessment method scale and resulted in four cohorts of patients: TMZ 150 mg/m2 5 days/week each 4 weeks and PEG 0.5 microg/kg/week - TMZ 150 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 1.0 microg/kg/week - TMZ 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 0.5 microg/kg/week - TMZ 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and PEG 1.0 microg/kg/week. Patients received a maximum of six cycles. Thirty-three patients were enrolled in this study: one in the first dose level, one in the second one, 18 in the third one and 11 in the fourth one. At level 4, four of 11 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity and four nondose-limiting toxicity; toxicity was mainly hematologic (grade IV thrombocytopenia). An objective response was observed in five patients (two complete response and three partial response) receiving level 3 or 4 of treatment. The disease remained stable in three patients, and six of 31 patients were alive 24 months after enrollment. The association of oral TMZ with subcutaneous PEG in metastatic melanoma displayed an unacceptable hematological toxicity with the dosages of 200 mg/m2 5 days/week and 1 microg/week, respectively. At a lower level, this treatment was effective and deserves further investigations to define its indications in metastatic melanoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18337651     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e3282f6309c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  6 in total

1.  ECOG phase II trial of graded-dose peginterferon α-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma overexpressing basic fibroblast growth factor (E2602).

Authors:  Ronald S Go; Sandra J Lee; Donghoon Shin; Steven M Callister; Dean A Jobe; Robert M Conry; Ahmad A Tarhini; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Pancreatic resection for metastatic melanoma. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Cosimo Sperti; Maria Laura Polizzi; Valentina Beltrame; Margherita Moro; Sergio Pedrazzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Metastatic tumors to the pancreas: The role of surgery.

Authors:  Cosimo Sperti; Lucia Moletta; Giuseppe Patanè
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10-15

5.  A phase I study of decitabine with pegylated interferon α-2b in advanced melanoma: impact on DNA methylation and lymphocyte populations.

Authors:  E R Plimack; J R Desai; J P Issa; J Jelinek; P Sharma; L M Vence; R L Bassett; J L Ilagan; N E Papadopoulos; W J Hwu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  Kristian Brock; Victoria Homer; Gurjinder Soul; Claire Potter; Cody Chiuzan; Shing Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.