Literature DB >> 18337498

Mutational load distribution analysis yields metrics reflecting genetic instability during pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Gemma Tarafa1, David Tuck, Daniela Ladner, Mark Topazian, Randall Brand, Carolyn Deters, Victor Moreno, Gabriel Capella, Henry Lynch, Paul Lizardi, Jose Costa.   

Abstract

Considering carcinogenesis as a microevolutionary process, best described in the context of metapopulation dynamics, provides the basis for theoretical and empirical studies that indicate it is possible to estimate the relative contribution of genetic instability and selection to the process of tumor formation. We show that mutational load distribution analysis (MLDA) of DNA found in pancreatic fluids yields biometrics that reflect the interplay of instability, selection, accident, and gene function that determines the eventual emergence of a tumor. An in silico simulation of carcinogenesis indicates that MLDA may be a suitable tool for early detection of pancreatic cancer. We also present evidence indicating that, when performed serially in individuals harboring a p16 germ-line mutation bestowing a high risk for pancreatic cancer, MLDA may be an effective tool for the longitudinal assessment of risk and early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18337498      PMCID: PMC2393774          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708250105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Carcinogen-specific induction of genetic instability.

Authors:  A Bardelli; D P Cahill; G Lederer; M R Speicher; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; C Lengauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The emergence and maintenance of diversity: insights from experimental bacterial populations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms.

Authors:  A Buckling; R Kassen; G Bell; P B Rainey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Progression model for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  R H Hruban; M Goggins; J Parsons; S E Kern
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Modelling the molecular circuitry of cancer.

Authors:  William C Hahn; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Somatic stem cells and the kinetics of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  John Cairns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  An investigation of mutation as a function of age in humans.

Authors:  C M King; E S Gillespie; P G McKenna; Y A Barnett
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systems pathology: a critical review.

Authors:  Jose Costa
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Contribution of the Type II Chaperonin, TRiC/CCT, to Oncogenesis.

Authors:  Soung-Hun Roh; Moses Kasembeli; Deenadayalan Bakthavatsalam; Wah Chiu; David J Tweardy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.