Literature DB >> 18337222

Medical device regulations and testing for toxicologic pathologists.

Joann C L Schuh1.   

Abstract

Awareness of the regulatory environment is fundamental to understanding the biological assessment of biomaterials and medical devices. Medical devices are a diverse and heterogeneous group of medical products and technologies defined by the lack of chemical action or requirement for metabolism. Regional activity and the Global Harmonization Task Force are now working on harmonizing the categorization and testing of medical devices. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has published 19 standards for biological evaluation. ISO 10993 standards are generally accepted outright or as an alternative to most national regulatory directives or acts, although Japan and the United States require more stringency in some tests. Type of materials, intended use, and risk are the basis for drafting testing programs for biomaterials and medical devices. With growth of the medical device industry and advent of new biomaterials and technologies, the need for toxicologic pathologists in safety (biocompatibility) and efficacy (conditions of use) evaluation of moderate- to high-risk devices is expanding. Preclinical evaluation of biomaterials and medical devices increasingly requires a basic understanding of materials science and bioengineering to facilitate interpretation of complex interface reactions between biomaterials, cellular and secretory factors, and vascular and tissue responses that modulate success or failure of medical devices.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18337222     DOI: 10.1177/0192623307309926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  6 in total

1.  Polymeric implant materials for the reconstruction of tracheal and pharyngeal mucosal defects in head and neck surgery.

Authors:  Dorothee Rickert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

2.  Real-time detection of implant-associated neutrophil responses using a formyl peptide receptor-targeting NIR nanoprobe.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Yi-Ting Tsai; Hong Weng; Ewin N Tang; Ashwin Nair; Digant P Davé; Liping Tang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-05-03

3.  Variant Purification of an Allogeneic Bone Block.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Markus Schlee; Sarah Al-Maawi; Poju Chia; Robert A Sader; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Acute intraocular toxicity caused by perfluorocarbon liquids: safety control systems of medical devices.

Authors:  Girish K Srivastava; Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan; Cristina Andrés-Iglesias; Shatrunajay Shukla; Rohit Saxena; Jose Carlos Pastor
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Histological evaluation of the biocompatibility of polyurea crosslinked silica aerogel implants in a rat model: a pilot study.

Authors:  Firouzeh Sabri; John D Boughter; David Gerth; Omar Skalli; Thien-Chuong N Phung; George-Rudolph M Tamula; Nicholas Leventis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Safety of an extended-release injectable moxidectin suspension formulation (ProHeart® 12) in dogs.

Authors:  Matthew J Krautmann; Sean Mahabir; Ann Fielder; Wendy Collard; Tracie L Wolthuis; Kevin Esch; Tracy Morton; Kent Alleman; Laibin Luo; Erin McCandless; Steven Nederveld; Kristina Kryda; Ryan Carroll; Joseph F Boucher
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.