Literature DB >> 18336577

Controlled, comparative study of relation between volume changes and interface pressure under short-stretch bandages in leg lymphedema patients.

Robert J Damstra1, Els R Brouwer, Hugo Partsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pressure loss under short-stretch bandages (SSBs) is a well-known phenomenon and is thought to be related to bandage relaxation and poor quality of application. AIM: The aim was to demonstrate that therapeutically intended volume reduction of the compressed leg is the most important cause for the loss of bandage pressure.
DESIGN: This was an experimental, controlled comparative study.
METHODS: In 20 patients suffering from lymphedema of the lower extremities and in 9 healthy persons, lower leg volume was measured by water displacement. After application of a pressure measurement device (Kikuhime) at the B1 region, SSBs were applied on one leg according to a standard protocol. Volume and pressure measurements were performed at 0, 2, and 24 hours in supine as well as standing positions.
RESULTS: A significant reduction of leg volume is already achieved 2 hours after bandage application, both in lymphedema patients and in normal controls. A further volume decrease of the lymphedematous legs is observed in the following 24 hours after application of a new bandage (-290 mL). The volume reduction is associated with a significant loss of bandage pressure from initial values over 60 mmHg by 37 and 48% in controls and lymphedema patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Inelastic, multilayer, multicomponent compression bandages lead to an immediate reduction of leg volume, both in lymphedematous and in normal legs. This therapeutically intended volume reduction seems to be the main reason for the fast decrease of the subbandage pressure. This study was supported by Lohmann & Rauscher, Ltd. Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18336577     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  5 in total

1.  Bandage pressure measurement and training: simple interventions to improve efficacy in compression bandaging.

Authors:  Anita Keller; Marcel L Müller; Trevis Calow; Ingrid K Kern; Hauke Schumann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Compression therapy for ulcers: The science and the art.

Authors:  Shashi B Gogia; Arun R Gogia
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05

3.  Immediate effects of active exercise with compression therapy on lower-limb lymphedema.

Authors:  Takuya Fukushima; Tetsuya Tsuji; Yufuko Sano; Chieko Miyata; Michiyo Kamisako; Hiroka Hohri; Chikako Yoshimura; Megumi Asakura; Taro Okitsu; Kaori Muraoka; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Wireless, skin-interfaced sensors for compression therapy.

Authors:  Yoonseok Park; Kyeongha Kwon; Sung Soo Kwak; Da Som Yang; Jean Won Kwak; Haiwen Luan; Ted S Chung; Keum San Chun; Jong Uk Kim; Hokyung Jang; Hanjun Ryu; Hyoyoung Jeong; Sang Min Won; Youn J Kang; Michael Zhang; David Pontes; Brianna R Kampmeier; Seon Hee Seo; Jeffrey Zhao; Inhwa Jung; Yonggang Huang; Shuai Xu; John A Rogers
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation D2 flexion and breathing exercises on lymphedema without a short stretch compression bandage.

Authors:  Woon Taek Hwang; Sin Ho Chung; Min Sung Chung; Kyu Hoon Lee; Taikon Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.