Literature DB >> 18336493

Measurement of tracheal wall pressure: a comparison of three different in vitro techniques.

T Horisberger1, S Gerber, V Bernet, M Weiss.   

Abstract

We compared three different tracheal wall pressure measuring techniques in vitro. Using a high-volume, low-pressure, cuffed tracheal tube with an internal diameter of 7.5 mm and a model trachea, the pressure difference technique, the wall pressure membrane technique and the microchip sensor probe technique with and without lubrication were studied. Wall pressures were measured after sequential injections of 0.5 ml of air into the cuff at cuff pressures ranging from 0 to 50 mmHg. The coefficient of variance was largest for the microchip sensor probe technique with lubrication (29%) and without lubrication (214%), and was lower for the wall pressure membrane technique (22%) and the pressure difference technique (19%). The wall pressure membrane and pressure difference techniques provided comparable results. The microchip sensor probe technique considerably underestimated wall pressure. These findings have an impact on the interpretation of published data on tracheal or pharyngeal wall pressure using the microchip sensor probe technique.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18336493     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05377.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  2 in total

1.  Association of Oversized Tracheal Tubes and Cuff Overinsufflation With Postintubation Tracheal Ruptures.

Authors:  Tobias H Sudhoff; Rainer O Seidl; Barbara Estel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Assessing the accuracy of ultrasound measurements of tracheal diameter: an in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Ran Ye; Feifei Cai; Chengnan Guo; Xiaocheng Zhang; Dan Yan; Chengshui Chen; Bin Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.