Literature DB >> 18336409

Chromium nanoparticle exhibits higher absorption efficiency than chromium picolinate and chromium chloride in Caco-2 cell monolayers.

L-Y Zha1, Z-R Xu, M-Q Wang, L-Y Gu.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine whether chromium nanoparticle (CrNano) exhibited higher absorption efficiency and possessed unique absorption mechanism in comparison to chromium picolinate (CrPic) and chromium chloride (CrCl(3)), as was postulated by previous reports. Twenty-one-day-old Caco-2 cell monolayers grown on semipermeable membranes in Snapwell tissue culture bichambers were incubated with CrNano, CrPic or CrCl(3) to examine their transport and uptake respectively. In the concentration range of 0.2-20 micromol/l, transport of CrNano, CrPic and CrCl(3) across Caco-2 monolayers both in apical-to-basolateral and basolateral-to-apical direction was concentration-, and time-dependent, and temperature independent. The apparent permeability coefficient (P(app)) of CrNano was between 5.89 and 7.92 x 10(-6) cm/s and that of CrPic and CrCl(3) was between 3.52 and 5.31 x 10(-6) cm/s and between 0.97 and 1.37 x 10(-6) cm/s respectively. Uptake of CrNano, CrPic and CrCl(3) by both apical and basolateral membranes was concentration- and time-dependent. Uptake of CrNano by apical membrane was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased when the incubation temperature was reduced from 37 degrees C to 4 degrees C. The transport efficiency of CrNano, CrPic and CrCl(3) after incubation for 120 min at 37 degrees C was 15.83% +/- 0.76%, 9.08% +/- 0.25% and 2.11% +/- 0.53% respectively. The uptake efficiency of CrNano, CrPic and CrCl(3) was 10.08% +/- 0.76%, 4.73% +/- 0.60% and 0.88% +/- 0.08% respectively. It was concluded that the epithelial transport of CrNano, CrPic and CrCl(3) across the Caco-2 cell monolayers was mainly via passive transport pathways. In addition, CrNano exhibited considerably higher absorption efficiency than both CrPic and CrCl(3) in Caco-2 cell monolayers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18336409     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00718.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)        ISSN: 0931-2439            Impact factor:   2.130


  5 in total

1.  Investigation of Twenty Metal, Metal Oxide, and Metal Sulfide Nanoparticles' Impact on Differentiated Caco-2 Monolayer Integrity.

Authors:  Ninell P Mortensen; Maria Moreno Caffaro; Purvi R Patel; Md Jamal Uddin; Shyam Aravamudhan; Susan J Sumner; Timothy R Fennell
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-02-13

2.  Toxicological effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on the growth rate, photosynthetic pigment content, and cell morphology of the duckweed Landoltia punctata.

Authors:  Cristina Moreira Lalau; Rodrigo de Almeida Mohedano; Éder C Schmidt; Zenilda L Bouzon; Luciane C Ouriques; Rodrigo W dos Santos; Cristina H da Costa; Denice S Vicentini; William Gerson Matias
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Ingrid L Bergin; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Int J Biomed Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2013

4.  Effect of selenium nanoparticles with different sizes in primary cultured intestinal epithelial cells of crucian carp, Carassius auratus gibelio.

Authors:  Yanbo Wang; Xuxia Yan; Linglin Fu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 5.  Comprehensive Approaches of Nanoparticles for Growth Performance and Health Benefits in Poultry: An Update on the Current Scenario.

Authors:  Ilyas Ahmad; Zia-Ur-Rehman Mashwani; Naveed Iqbal Raja; Abeer Kazmi; Abdul Wahab; Amir Ali; Zohaib Younas; Saman Yaqoob; Mehdi Rahimi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.