Literature DB >> 18335076

Uncertainties in the relationship between tibia lead and cumulative blood lead index.

Norm Healey, David R Chettle, Fiona E McNeill, David E B Fleming.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18335076      PMCID: PMC2265029          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10778R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
Uncertainties in the relationship between bone Pb and cumulative blood lead index (CBLI), including evidence of nonlinearity and differences between the sexes, should be appropriately recognized when setting workplace blood Pb limits to achieve target bone Pb concentrations. Schwartz and Hu (2007) recommended a maximum occupational tibia Pb concentration of 15 μg/g. They stated that, based on the slope of the relationship between tibia Pb and CBLI calculated by Hu et al. (2007), a tibia Pb of 15 μg/g can be avoided by limiting the CBLI to < 200–400 μg-years/dL. Hu et al. (2007) acknowledged the uncertainty in the slope of the relationship between tibia Pb and CBLI. However, over the range of cumulative Pb exposures that would produce a tibia Pb concentration of 15 μg/g, the slope of the relationship between tibia Pb and CBLI may be less than the slope of 0.05 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.046–0.055] μg/g per μg-years/dL calculated by Hu et al. (2007). Table 1 presents slopes and mean tibia Pb concentrations among subjects of eight published studies. Gerhardsson et al. (1993) reported a slope of 0.022 μg/g per μg-years/dL (no uncertainty reported) and Armstrong et al. (1992) reported a slope of 0.10 (± 0.02) μg/g per μg-years/dL. These represent a greater range of slopes than reported by Hu et al. (2007).
Table 1

Various slopes of the relationship between tibia Pb and CBLI, and related mean tibia Pb concentration among study subjects.

StudyNo.rSlopeaMean Pb (μg/g tibia bone mineral)
Gerhardsson et al. (1993)1000.600.02216.9
Erkkilä et al. (1992)910.660.028 ± 0.00321.1
Somervaille et al. (1988)790.860.050 ± 0.00331.0
Somervaille et al. (1988)880.820.060 ± 0.00532.3
Cake (1994)530.700.059 ± 0.00939
Fleming et al. (1997)3670.830.056 ± 0.00240.6
Hu et al. (1991)120.920.061 ± 0.00846
Armstrong et al. (1992)150.870.10 ± 0.0254.8

Units are μg/g bone mineral per μg-year/dL.

These data also suggest that the tibia Pb versus CBLI slope may not be constant, with lower slopes evident for lower tibia Pb and CBLI levels. This trend has been noted previously (Chettle 2005; Fleming et al. 1997). For tibia Pb concentrations of approximately 15 μg/g, a slope of approximately 0.025 μg/g per μg-years/dL seems equally plausible as the slope calculated by Hu et al. (2007). A slope of 0.025 μg/g per μg-years/dL yields an allowable CBLI of 600 μg-years/dL, or an average annual blood Pb concentration of 15 μg/dL for 40 working years. This compares to 5–10 μg/dL for 40 working years associated with Schwartz and Hu’s (2007) recommended CBLI of 200–400 μg-years/dL. These slopes are also based on studies of predominantly male subjects and may not account for differences in Pb toxicokinetics between the sexes (McNeill et al. 2000; Popovic et al. 2005).
  10 in total

1.  In vivo measurements of lead in bone at four anatomical sites: long term occupational and consequent endogenous exposure.

Authors:  J Erkkilä; R Armstrong; V Riihimäki; D R Chettle; A Paakkari; M Scott; L Somervaille; J Starck; B Kock; A Aitio
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-09

2.  Repeated measurements of tibia lead concentrations by in vivo x ray fluorescence in occupational exposure.

Authors:  R Armstrong; D R Chettle; M C Scott; L J Somervaille; M Pendlington
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-01

3.  In vivo tibia lead measurements as an index of cumulative exposure in occupationally exposed subjects.

Authors:  L J Somervaille; D R Chettle; M C Scott; D R Tennant; M J McKiernan; A Skilbeck; W N Trethowan
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-03

4.  In vivo measurements of lead in bone in long-term exposed lead smelter workers.

Authors:  L Gerhardsson; R Attewell; D R Chettle; V Englyst; N G Lundström; G F Nordberg; H Nyhlin; M C Scott; A C Todd
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1993 May-Jun

5.  109Cd K x ray fluorescence measurements of tibial lead content in young adults exposed to lead in early childhood.

Authors:  F E McNeill; L Stokes; J A Brito; D R Chettle; W E Kaye
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Effect of repeated occupational exposure to lead, cessation of exposure, and chelation on levels of lead in bone.

Authors:  H Hu; L Pepper; R Goldman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 7.  The epidemiology of lead toxicity in adults: measuring dose and consideration of other methodologic issues.

Authors:  Howard Hu; Regina Shih; Stephen Rothenberg; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Accumulated body burden and endogenous release of lead in employees of a lead smelter.

Authors:  D E Fleming; D Boulay; N S Richard; J P Robin; C L Gordon; C E Webber; D R Chettle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Impact of occupational exposure on lead levels in women.

Authors:  Marija Popovic; Fiona E McNeill; David R Chettle; Colin E Webber; C Virginia Lee; Wendy E Kaye
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Adult lead exposure: time for change.

Authors:  Brian S Schwartz; Howard Hu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.