Literature DB >> 18334837

Large-scale analysis of cell cycle regulators in urothelial bladder cancer identifies p16 and p27 as potentially useful prognostic markers.

Andrea Brunner1, Irmgard Verdorfer, Martina Prelog, Christina Mayerl, Gregor Mikuz, Alexandar Tzankov.   

Abstract

AIMS: We investigated the value of multiple cell cycle markers for their prognostic impact on overall survival and recurrence-free survival in urothelial carcinoma (UC).
METHODS: A tissue microarray consisting of 99 UCs was evaluated for the expression of p53, p16, p21, p27, cyclin D1, cyclin E , Bcl-2, Ki-67 and PCNA. Statistical analysis was performed applying Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models using receiver operator characteristic curves for determination of markers' cutoffs.
RESULTS: Expression above the cutoffs of Ki-67, p53 and p27, particularly in high-grade and early-stage UC, was associated with worse overall survival, while expression of p16 indicated a better outcome in low-grade and low-stage tumors. Recurrence-free survival was better in patients with high-grade UC expressing PCNA, p16 and cyclin E, and low-grade UC expressing Bcl-2 above the cutoffs, but worse in all tumors with high Ki-67.
CONCLUSION: Cell cycle deregulation in UC is complex and the prognostic value of the various involved proteins should be differentially regarded with respect to this complexity and other tumor characteristics such as grade and stage. Our results point towards the role of p16- and p27-associated pathways in tumor progression and indicate that, by using standardized approaches for tissue antigen expression, evaluation and cutoff determination, single potentially useful prognostic markers could be identified. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18334837     DOI: 10.1159/000113792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathobiology        ISSN: 1015-2008            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  Low prevalence of HPV detection and genotyping in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer using single-step PCR followed by reverse line blot.

Authors:  Renate Pichler; Wegene Borena; Georg Schäfer; Claudia Manzl; Zoran Culig; Sebastian List; Sabrina Neururer; Dorothee Von Laer; Isabel Heidegger; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Hannes Steiner; Andrea Brunner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Cell-cycle control in urothelial carcinoma: large-scale tissue array analysis of tumor tissue from Maine and Vermont.

Authors:  Petra Lenz; Ruth Pfeiffer; Dalsu Baris; Alan R Schned; Mikiko Takikita; M Cristina Poscablo; Molly Schwenn; Alison Johnson; Michael Jones; Masatoshi Kida; Kenneth P Cantor; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman; Stephen M Hewitt; Lee E Moore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in the recurrence of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Young-Hee Maeng; Su-Yong Eun; Jung-Sik Huh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

4.  A new tumour suppression mechanism by p27Kip1: EGFR down-regulation mediated by JNK/c-Jun pathway inhibition.

Authors:  Yong Fang; Yihong Wang; Yulei Wang; Yan Meng; Junlan Zhu; Honglei Jin; Jingxia Li; Dongyun Zhang; Yonghui Yu; Xue-Ru Wu; Chuanshu Huang
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Tumor markers of bladder cancer: the schistosomal bladder tumors versus non-schistosomal bladder tumors.

Authors:  Ahmed S Abdulamir; Rand R Hafidh; Haider S Kadhim; Fatimah Abubakar
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-25

Review 6.  Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of Downregulated p16 Expression in Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoning Gan; Xiaomiao Lin; Rongquan He; Xinggu Lin; Hanlin Wang; Liyan Yan; Hong Zhou; Hui Qin; Gang Chen
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.434

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.