Literature DB >> 18334830

Prognostic factors and prognostic index for chemonaïve and gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

R Maréchal1, A Demols, F Gay, V De Maertelaere, M Arvanitaki, A Hendlisz, J L Van Laethem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine monotherapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of patients suffering from advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). For a few years, new chemotherapeutic agents and combinations have been under validation. The use of such treatment makes it necessary to determine factors that could predict survival time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To identify factors that predict survival time in chemonaïve patients with advanced PC and after gemcitabine failure, a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with advanced PC coming from phase II and III studies and treated with gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (median age 66 years, range 27-87) suffering from pathologically proven unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were reviewed. Median overall survival time for the whole population was 251 days and progression-free survival in first- and second-line treatment was 108 and 67 days, respectively. The Cox regression analysis identified aspartate transaminase >53 IU/l, weight loss > or =10% and Karnofsky performance status <90 as significant independent negative prognostic factors in first-line and CA 19-9 >400 IU/ml and albumin < or =3.5 mg/dl in second-line chemotherapy. A prognostic index was calculated from the regression coefficients for each independent prognostic factor and used to classify the patients in 3 different groups with good, intermediate and poor prognosis. The prognosis index in chemonaïve and gemcitabine-refractory patients was (Karnofsky performance status x 0.52) + (weight loss x 1.10) + (aspartate transaminase x 0.82) and (albumin x 1.40) + (CA 19-9 x 0.74), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Predictive factors could be identified in first- and second-line treatments, although they require prospective validation before they could be used in the design and analysis of future clinical trials. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18334830     DOI: 10.1159/000120627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  19 in total

1.  Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Romain Altwegg; Marc Ychou; Vanessa Guillaumon; Simon Thezenas; Pierre Senesse; Nicolas Flori; Thibault Mazard; Ludovic Caillo; Stéphanie Faure; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Postoperative care following pancreatic surgery: surveillance and treatment.

Authors:  Volker Keim; Ernst Klar; Michael Poll; Michael H Schoenberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Haas; Rüdiger P Laubender; Petra Stieber; Stefan Holdenrieder; Christiane J Bruns; Ralf Wilkowski; Ulrich Mansmann; Volker Heinemann; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-05-18

4.  Preoperative body composition is influenced by the stage of operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma but does not predict survival after Whipple's procedure.

Authors:  Alireza Aslani; Anthony J Gill; Paul J Roach; Barry J Allen; Ross C Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Efficacy of S-1 in second-line chemotherapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kiyotsugu Iede; Terumasa Yamada; Ryo Kato; Masami Ueda; Yujiro Tsuda; Shinsuke Nakashima; Katsuya Ohta; Jin Matsuyama; Masakazu Ikenaga; Shusei Tominaga
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-08-28

6.  Multimodality treatment of pancreatic cancer with liver metastases using chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or Chinese herbal medicine.

Authors:  Huaqiang Ouyang; Peng Wang; Zhiqiang Meng; Zhen Chen; Er'xin Yu; Huan Jin; David Z Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Lorenzo Cohen; Luming Liu
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Poor Performance Status Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Eric S Orman; Marwan Ghabril; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Evaluation of DNA ploidy in relation with established prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Nikolas Tsavaris; Nicolaos Kavantzas; Kostantinos Tsigritis; Ioannis D Xynos; Nikitas Papadoniou; Andreas Lazaris; Christos Kosmas; George Agrogiannis; Anna Dokou; Evangelos Felekouras; Efstathios Antoniou; Aris Polyzos; John Sarantonis; Heracles Tsipras; Gavrilos Karatzas; Alexandros Papalambros; Efstratios S Patsouris
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  The Association Between Chemoradiation-related Lymphopenia and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron T Wild; Xiaobu Ye; Susannah G Ellsworth; Jessica A Smith; Amol K Narang; Tanu Garg; Jian Campian; Daniel A Laheru; Lei Zheng; Christopher L Wolfgang; Phuoc T Tran; Stuart A Grossman; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Predictive implications of decreased CA19-9 at 8 weeks during nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for the induction of second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kiyotsugu Iede; Terumasa Yamada; Ryo Kato; Masami Ueda; Yujiro Tsuda; Shinsuke Nakashima; Katsuya Ohta; Jin Matsuyama; Masakazu Ikenaga; Shusei Tominaga
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.