Literature DB >> 18334447

Intraoperative magnetic tracker calibration using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker for 3-D ultrasound-based navigation in laparoscopic surgery.

Masahiko Nakamoto1, Kazuhisa Nakada, Yoshinobu Sato, Kozo Konishi, Makoto Hashizume, Shinichi Tamura.   

Abstract

This paper describes a ultrasound (3-D US) system that aims to achieve augmented reality (AR) visualization during laparoscopic surgery, especially for the liver. To acquire 3-D US data of the liver, the tip of a laparoscopic ultrasound probe is tracked inside the abdominal cavity using a magnetic tracker. The accuracy of magnetic trackers, however, is greatly affected by magnetic field distortion that results from the close proximity of metal objects and electronic equipment, which is usually unavoidable in the operating room. In this paper, we describe a calibration method for intraoperative magnetic distortion that can be applied to laparoscopic 3-D US data acquisition; we evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of the method by in vitro and in vivo experiments. Although calibration data can be acquired freehand using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker, there are two problems associated with this method--error caused by the time delay between measurements of the optical and magnetic trackers, and instability of the calibration accuracy that results from the uniformity and density of calibration data. A temporal calibration procedure is developed to estimate the time delay, which is then integrated into the calibration, and a distortion model is formulated by zeroth-degree to fourth-degree polynomial fitting to the calibration data. In the in vivo experiment using a pig, the positional error caused by magnetic distortion was reduced from 44.1 to 2.9 mm. The standard deviation of corrected target positions was less than 1.0 mm. Freehand acquisition of calibration data was performed smoothly using a magneto-optic hybrid sampling tool through a trocar under guidance by realtime 3-D monitoring of the tool trajectory; data acquisition time was less than 2 min. The present study suggests that our proposed method could correct for magnetic field distortion inside the patient's abdomen during a laparoscopic procedure within a clinically permissible period of time, as well as enabling an accurate 3-D US reconstruction to be obtained that can be superimposed onto live endoscopic images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18334447     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.911003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  10 in total

1.  Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device.

Authors:  Satoshi Ieiri; Munenori Uemura; Kouzou Konishi; Ryota Souzaki; Yoshihiro Nagao; Norifumi Tsutsumi; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Takeshi Ohdaira; Morimasa Tomikawa; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume; Tomoaki Taguchi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment.

Authors:  Ziv Yaniv; Emmanuel Wilson; David Lindisch; Kevin Cleary
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas Langø; Sinara Vijayan; Anna Rethy; Cecilie Våpenstad; Ole Vegard Solberg; Ronald Mårvik; Gjermund Johnsen; Toril N Hernes
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study.

Authors:  M Wagner; M Gondan; C Zöllner; J J Wünscher; F Nickel; L Albala; A Groch; S Suwelack; S Speidel; L Maier-Hein; B P Müller-Stich; H G Kenngott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Image-guided laparoscopic surgery in an open MRI operating theater.

Authors:  Norifumi Tsutsumi; Morimasa Tomikawa; Munenori Uemura; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Yoshihiro Nagao; Kozo Konishi; Satoshi Ieiri; Jaesung Hong; Yoshihiko Maehara; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Augmented reality in a tumor resection model.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvet; Toby Collins; Clement Debize; Lorraine Novais-Gameiro; Bruno Pereira; Adrien Bartoli; Michel Canis; Nicolas Bourdel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Augmented reality in gynecologic surgery: evaluation of potential benefits for myomectomy in an experimental uterine model.

Authors:  Nicolas Bourdel; Toby Collins; Daniel Pizarro; Adrien Bartoli; David Da Ines; Bruno Perreira; Michel Canis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Cristian A Linte; Katherine P Davenport; Kevin Cleary; Craig Peters; Kirby G Vosburgh; Nassir Navab; Philip Eddie Edwards; Pierre Jannin; Terry M Peters; David R Holmes; Richard A Robb
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  LAPKaans: Tool-Motion Tracking and Gripping Force-Sensing Modular Smart Laparoscopic Training System.

Authors:  Luis H Olivas-Alanis; Ricardo A Calzada-Briseño; Victor Segura-Ibarra; Elisa V Vázquez; Jose A Diaz-Elizondo; Eduardo Flores-Villalba; Ciro A Rodriguez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  P Vávra; J Roman; P Zonča; P Ihnát; M Němec; J Kumar; N Habib; A El-Gendi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.