Literature DB >> 18333972

The shape of controversy: what counts as an explanation of development? Introduction to the special section.

Larissa K Samuelson1, Paul Bloom.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18333972     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  The shape of things to come: the future of the shape bias controversy.

Authors:  Frank C Keil
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-03

2.  How we categorize objects is related to how we remember them: The shape bias as a memory bias.

Authors:  Haley A Vlach
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  Rigid thinking about deformables: do children sometimes overgeneralize the shape bias?

Authors:  Larissa K Samuelson; Jessica S Horst; Anne R Schutte; Brandi N Dobbertin
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2008-08

4.  The dynamic nature of knowledge: insights from a dynamic field model of children's novel noun generalization.

Authors:  Larissa K Samuelson; Anne R Schutte; Jessica S Horst
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-01-07

5.  To have and to hold: looking vs. touching in the study of categorization.

Authors:  Lynn K Perry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-18

6.  Word generalization by a dog (Canis familiaris): is shape important?

Authors:  Emile van der Zee; Helen Zulch; Daniel Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of feature saliency on visual category learning.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 8.  Beyond modeling abstractions: learning nouns over developmental time in atypical populations and individuals.

Authors:  Clare E Sims; Savannah M Schilling; Eliana Colunga
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.