BACKGROUND: International Consensus Criteria (ICC) consider right-to-left shunt (RLS) present when Transcranial Doppler (TCD) detects even one microbubble (microB). Spencer Logarithmic Scale (SLS) offers more grades of RLS with detection of >30 microB corresponding to a large shunt. We compared the yield of ICC and SLS in detection and quantification of a large RLS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated paradoxical embolism in consecutive patients with ischemic strokes or transient ischemic attack (TIA) using injections of 9 cc saline agitated with 1 cc of air. Results were classified according to ICC [negative (no microB), grade I (1-20 microB), grade II (>20 microB or "shower" appearance of microB), and grade III ("curtain" appearance of microB)] and SLS criteria [negative (no microB), grade I (1-10 microB), grade II (11-30 microB), grade III (31100 microB), grade IV (101300 microB), grade V (>300 microB)]. The RLS size was defined as large (>4 mm) using diameter measurement of the septal defects on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). RESULTS: TCD comparison to TEE showed 24 true positive, 48 true negative, 4 false positive, and 2 false negative cases (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 92.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 85.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96%, and accuracy 92.3%) for any RLS presence. Both ICC and SLS were 100% sensitive for detection of large RLS. ICC and SLS criteria yielded a false positive rate of 24.4% and 7.7%, respectively when compared to TEE. CONCLUSIONS: Although both grading scales provide agreement as to any shunt presence, using the Spencer Scale grade III or higher can decrease by one-half the number of false positive TCD diagnoses to predict large RLS on TEE.
BACKGROUND: International Consensus Criteria (ICC) consider right-to-left shunt (RLS) present when Transcranial Doppler (TCD) detects even one microbubble (microB). Spencer Logarithmic Scale (SLS) offers more grades of RLS with detection of >30 microB corresponding to a large shunt. We compared the yield of ICC and SLS in detection and quantification of a large RLS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated paradoxical embolism in consecutive patients with ischemic strokes or transient ischemic attack (TIA) using injections of 9 cc saline agitated with 1 cc of air. Results were classified according to ICC [negative (no microB), grade I (1-20 microB), grade II (>20 microB or "shower" appearance of microB), and grade III ("curtain" appearance of microB)] and SLS criteria [negative (no microB), grade I (1-10 microB), grade II (11-30 microB), grade III (31100 microB), grade IV (101300 microB), grade V (>300 microB)]. The RLS size was defined as large (>4 mm) using diameter measurement of the septal defects on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). RESULTS:TCD comparison to TEE showed 24 true positive, 48 true negative, 4 false positive, and 2 false negative cases (sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 92.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 85.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) 96%, and accuracy 92.3%) for any RLS presence. Both ICC and SLS were 100% sensitive for detection of large RLS. ICC and SLS criteria yielded a false positive rate of 24.4% and 7.7%, respectively when compared to TEE. CONCLUSIONS: Although both grading scales provide agreement as to any shunt presence, using the Spencer Scale grade III or higher can decrease by one-half the number of false positive TCD diagnoses to predict large RLS on TEE.
Authors: Brian H West; Rubine Gevorgyan Fleming; Bashar Al Hemyari; Pooya Banankhah; Kenneth Meyer; Leslie H Rozier; Linda S Murphy; Alexandra C Coluzzi; Joshua L Rusheen; Preetham Kumar; David Elashoff; Jonathan M Tobis Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Adam de Havenon; Anne Moore; Ali Sultan-Qurraie; Jennifer J Majersik; Greg Stoddard; David Tirschwell Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Anetta Lasek-Bal; Przemysław Puz; Joanna Wieczorek; Seweryn Nowak; Anna Maria Wnuk-Wojnar; Aldona Warsz-Wianecka; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Arvind K Sharma; Lokesh Bathala; Amit Batra; Man Mohan Mehndiratta; Vijay K Sharma Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 1.383