| Literature DB >> 18333500 |
Mary Candice Ross1, Kandy K Smith, Anita Smith, Rebecca Ryan, Lidia Webb, Susanne Humphreys.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the nature of information in after-action reports in terms of nursing practice and the utility of using after-action reports in a feedback loop to improve nursing training. This was a three-phase, mixed-method, qualitative study, using focus groups, phone surveys, and e-mail surveys to collect data. The sample consisted of 72 military nurses (Air Force, Navy, and Army) deployed in the last 4 years. The process of after-action reporting is unknown to the majority of nurse corps officers. Topics of concern in after-actions reporting included supplies, psychosocial issues, personnel, communications, logistics, and after-actions reporting process. Traditional written after-actions reporting has not provided an adequate feedback loop. Alternative methods suggested included "hot wash" meetings, online submissions, e-mail contributions, and verbal debriefings. After-actions reporting could yield an excellent wealth of information, if reported in a timely and detailed manner, for nursing leaders.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18333500 DOI: 10.7205/milmed.173.2.210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mil Med ISSN: 0026-4075 Impact factor: 1.437