Literature DB >> 18333227

Microbiological assessment of bile during cholecystectomy: is all bile infected?

G J Morris-Stiff1, P O'Donohue, S Ogunbiyi, W G Sheridan.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of bactibilia in patients undergoing cholecystectomy and to relate the presence or absence of organisms to the preoperative and postoperative course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing cholecystectomy under the care of a single consultant surgeon during a continuous 5-year period were identified from a prospectively maintained departmental database. Symptoms, clinical signs, findings of investigations, details of treatment and postoperative care were noted. Risk factors for bactibilia (acute cholecystitis, common duct stones, emergency surgery, intraoperative findings and age > 70 years) were documented. Patients were divided according to the presence (B + ) or absence (B-) of bacteria on culture of their bile.
RESULTS: In all, 128/180 (70%) of cholecystectomies had full data available for analysis. Bacteria were identified in the bile of 20 (15.6%) patients (B+ group). The B+ group was significantly older at 63.78+/-9.7 versus 61.62+/-13.9 (p<0.05) and contained significantly fewer females than the B- group (p<0.05). All 20 patients (100%) in the B+ group had > or = 1 risk factor, while these factors were present in only 29/108 (30.3%) of patients in the B- group (p<0.05). The overall incidence of infective complications was 20% in the B+ group compared with 0.9% in the B- group (p<0.05) and the bile-related infections were higher in the B+ group (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that while patients with complicated gallstone disease frequently exhibit bactibilia, patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis have aseptic bile. The findings would suggest that prophylactic antibiotics should be limited to patients with risk factors for bactibilia.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18333227      PMCID: PMC2063606          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701275105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  23 in total

1.  A prospective, randomised trial of prophylactic antibiotics versus bag extraction in the prophylaxis of wound infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Harling; N Moorjani; C Perry; A P MacGowan; M H Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A prospective randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Koc; B Zulfikaroglu; C Kece; N Ozalp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The need for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A Tocchi; L Lepre; G Costa; G Liotta; G Mazzoni; F Maggiolini
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-01

4.  Ascending infection of the biliary tract after surgical sphincterotomy and biliary stenting.

Authors:  J Y Sung; J W Leung; E A Shaffer; K Lam; M E Olson; J W Costerton
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection.

Authors:  D C Classen; R S Evans; S L Pestotnik; S D Horn; R L Menlove; J P Burke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The absent role of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K J Dobay; D T Freier; P Albear
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 7.  Epidemiology and natural history of gallstone disease.

Authors:  A K Diehl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  V Mahatharadol
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2001-01

9.  Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery.

Authors:  P T den Hoed; R U Boelhouwer; H F Veen; W C Hop; H A Bruining
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Multifactorial analysis of septic bile and septic complications in biliary surgery.

Authors:  O Landau; I Kott; A A Deutsch; E Stelman; R Reiss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of and risk factors for biliary carriage of bacteria showing worrisome and unexpected resistance traits.

Authors:  E Maseda; G Maggi; R Gomez-Gil; G Ruiz; R Madero; A Garcia-Perea; L Aguilar; F Gilsanz; J Rodriguez-Baño
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A selective antibiotic prophylaxis policy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective in minimising infective complications.

Authors:  F Yanni; P Mekhail; G Morris-Stiff
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Clinical implication of bactibilia in moderate to severe acute cholecystitis undergone cholecystostomy following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Je Ho Yoon; Kwang Yeol Paik; Hoo Young Chung; Ji Seon Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinical aspects of bile culture in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Pil Yun; Hyung-Il Seo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Clinical Presentation and Incidence of Anaerobic Bacteria in Surgically Treated Biliary Tract Infections and Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jens Strohäker; Lisa Wiegand; Christian Beltzer; Alfred Königsrainer; Ruth Ladurner; Anke Meier
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.