BACKGROUND: Strategies for the management of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis remain controversial. While consensus opinion supports operative necrosectomy for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis, the timing for surgical intervention is not completely resolved. Further, the indication for the surgical management of sterile pancreatic necrosis is also subject to debate. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcome measures for the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis, independent of documented infection. A retrospective review was undertaken between 1994 and 2002 at a single county hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with CT-documented necrotizing pancreatitis underwent operative pancreatic necrosectomy with laparostomy within 21 days of initial diagnosis and had an average of three reoperations. Average length of stay (LOS) in the ICU was 36 days and in the hospital 67 days. Ten patients had documented infected necrosis based on initial intra-operative cultures, while I I had sterile necrosis. Overall, 95% (20/21) of the patients had a complication, with an average of three complications per patient. Common complications included ARDS (71%), sepsis (33%), renal failure (24%), and pneumonia (24%). The overall mortality rate was 14% (3/21), with a mean follow-up of 469 days. DISCUSSION: The surgical management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, independent of documented infection, can be undertaken within 3 weeks of diagnosis with an acceptable morbidity and a low mortality rate. Creation of a laparostomy to enable ready, atraumatic debridement of the retroperitoneum is a safe alternative to standard repeat laparotomies and thus represents a useful adjunct to the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis.
BACKGROUND: Strategies for the management of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis remain controversial. While consensus opinion supports operative necrosectomy for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis, the timing for surgical intervention is not completely resolved. Further, the indication for the surgical management of sterile pancreatic necrosis is also subject to debate. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcome measures for the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis, independent of documented infection. A retrospective review was undertaken between 1994 and 2002 at a single county hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with CT-documented necrotizing pancreatitis underwent operative pancreatic necrosectomy with laparostomy within 21 days of initial diagnosis and had an average of three reoperations. Average length of stay (LOS) in the ICU was 36 days and in the hospital 67 days. Ten patients had documented infected necrosis based on initial intra-operative cultures, while I I had sterile necrosis. Overall, 95% (20/21) of the patients had a complication, with an average of three complications per patient. Common complications included ARDS (71%), sepsis (33%), renal failure (24%), and pneumonia (24%). The overall mortality rate was 14% (3/21), with a mean follow-up of 469 days. DISCUSSION: The surgical management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, independent of documented infection, can be undertaken within 3 weeks of diagnosis with an acceptable morbidity and a low mortality rate. Creation of a laparostomy to enable ready, atraumatic debridement of the retroperitoneum is a safe alternative to standard repeat laparotomies and thus represents a useful adjunct to the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis.
Authors: Gautham Srinivasan; L Venkatakrishnan; Swaminathan Sambandam; Gursharan Singh; Maninder Kaur; Krishnaveni Janarthan; B Joseph John Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2016 Oct-Dec
Authors: Péter Hegyi; Andrea Szentesi; Szabolcs Kiss; József Pintér; Roland Molontay; Marcell Nagy; Nelli Farkas; Zoltán Sipos; Péter Fehérvári; László Pecze; Mária Földi; Áron Vincze; Tamás Takács; László Czakó; Ferenc Izbéki; Adrienn Halász; Eszter Boros; József Hamvas; Márta Varga; Artautas Mickevicius; Nándor Faluhelyi; Orsolya Farkas; Szilárd Váncsa; Rita Nagy; Stefania Bunduc; Péter Jenő Hegyi; Katalin Márta; Katalin Borka; Attila Doros; Nóra Hosszúfalusi; László Zubek; Bálint Erőss; Zsolt Molnár; Andrea Párniczky Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.996