Literature DB >> 18332300

Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care.

Kypros Kypri1, John D Langley, John B Saunders, Martine L Cashell-Smith, Peter Herbison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence supporting screening and brief intervention (SBI) for hazardous drinking, yet it remains underused in primary health care. Electronic (computer or Web-based) SBI (e-SBI) offers the prospects of ease and economy of access. We sought to determine whether e-SBI reduces hazardous drinking.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in a university primary health care service. Participants were 975 students (age range, 17-29 years) screened using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Of 599 students who scored in the hazardous or harmful range, 576 (300 of whom were women) consented to the trial and were randomized to receive an information pamphlet (control group), a Web-based motivational intervention (single-dose e-SBI group), or a Web-based motivational intervention with further interventions 1 and 6 months later (multidose e-SBI group).
RESULTS: Relative to the control group, the single-dose e-SBI group at 6 months reported a lower frequency of drinking (rate ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.94), less total consumption (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95), and fewer academic problems (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91). At 12 months, statistically significant differences in total consumption (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95 [equivalent to 3.5 standard drinks per week]) and in academic problems (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) remained, and the AUDIT scores were 2.17 (95% CI, -1.10 to -3.24) points lower. Relative to the control group, the multidose e-SBI group at 6 months reported a lower frequency of drinking (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.98), less total consumption (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97 [equivalent to 3.0 standard drinks per week]), reduced episodic heavy drinking (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93), and fewer academic problems (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). At 12 months, statistically significant differences in academic problems remained (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90), while the AUDIT scores were 2.02 (95% CI, -0.97 to -3.10) points lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose e-SBI reduces hazardous drinking, and the effect lasts 12 months. Additional sessions seem not to enhance the effect. Trial Registration www.anzctr.org.au Identifier:ACTRN012607000103460.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18332300     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  79 in total

1.  Triaging patients at risk of influenza using a patient portal.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Titus L Daniels; Thomas R Talbot; Taylor McClain; Robert Hennes; Shane Stenner; Sue Muse; Jim Jirjis; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Research in the Integration of Behavioral Health for Adolescents and Young Adults in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura P Richardson; Carolyn A McCarty; Ana Radovic; Ahna Ballonoff Suleiman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 3.  Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking.

Authors:  Richard Saitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2010-11

Review 4.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Understanding barriers to specialty substance abuse treatment among Latinos.

Authors:  Miguel Pinedo; Sarah Zemore; Shannon Rogers
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-08-08

6.  Alcohol use severity and age moderate the effects of brief interventions in an emergency department randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne C Fernandez; Rebecca Waller; Maureen A Walton; Erin E Bonar; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Stephen T Chermack; Rebecca M Cunningham; Brenda M Booth; Mark A Ilgen; Kristen L Barry; Frederic C Blow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Providing alcohol-related screening and brief interventions to adolescents through health care systems: obstacles and solutions.

Authors:  Duncan B Clark; Howard B Moss
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic screening programme and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use in primary care.

Authors:  Luqman Tariq; Matthijs van den Berg; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Pieter H M van Baal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; T Cameron Wild; Joanne Cordingley; Trevor van Mierlo; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Bayes' Theorem to estimate population prevalence from Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores.

Authors:  David R Foxcroft; Kypros Kypri; Vanessa Simonite
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.