BACKGROUND: The restrictive filling pattern seen with severe heart failure (HF) may be due to diastolic dysfunction with elevated left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressure or may be merely a manifestation of an overfilled LV as a result of increased left atrial (LA) pressure. We investigated whether the LV restrictive filling pattern is due to elevated LA pressure alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied conscious dogs instrumented to measure LA pressure, LV pressure, and 3 LV diameters. LV filling dynamics were evaluated in 2 situations with similar elevations of LA pressure: in normal animals after rapid volume loading with dextran 500 mL and in animals with pacing-induced HF with restrictive filling. With HF, there was increased LV chamber stiffness and slow relaxation. Volume loading and HF had similar heart rates (129+/-19 versus 131+/-15 bpm) and LA pressure (22.1+/-5.8 versus 22.6+/-3.3 mm Hg). The peak early filling rate (E) was increased with both HF and volume loading. However, in HF, the peak mitral annular velocity (E') was decreased and delayed, and the E deceleration time was shorter. In contrast, with volume loading, E' was increased and not delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The restrictive filling pattern is distinguished from overfilling of a normal ventricle by a reduced and delayed E' and a shortened E deceleration time that reflect slow relaxation and increased LV stiffness.
BACKGROUND: The restrictive filling pattern seen with severe heart failure (HF) may be due to diastolic dysfunction with elevated left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressure or may be merely a manifestation of an overfilled LV as a result of increased left atrial (LA) pressure. We investigated whether the LV restrictive filling pattern is due to elevated LA pressure alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied conscious dogs instrumented to measure LA pressure, LV pressure, and 3 LV diameters. LV filling dynamics were evaluated in 2 situations with similar elevations of LA pressure: in normal animals after rapid volume loading with dextran 500 mL and in animals with pacing-induced HF with restrictive filling. With HF, there was increased LV chamber stiffness and slow relaxation. Volume loading and HF had similar heart rates (129+/-19 versus 131+/-15 bpm) and LA pressure (22.1+/-5.8 versus 22.6+/-3.3 mm Hg). The peak early filling rate (E) was increased with both HF and volume loading. However, in HF, the peak mitral annular velocity (E') was decreased and delayed, and the E deceleration time was shorter. In contrast, with volume loading, E' was increased and not delayed. CONCLUSIONS: The restrictive filling pattern is distinguished from overfilling of a normal ventricle by a reduced and delayed E' and a shortened E deceleration time that reflect slow relaxation and increased LV stiffness.
Authors: Anna Bauer; Markus Khalil; Monika Lüdemann; Jürgen Bauer; Anoosh Esmaeili; Roberta De-Rosa; Norbert F Voelkel; Hakan Akintuerk; Dietmar Schranz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Andrew D M Grant; Kazuaki Negishi; Tomoko Negishi; Patrick Collier; Samir R Kapadia; James D Thomas; Thomas H Marwick; Brian P Griffin; Zoran B Popović Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 2.062