Jennifer C Cornman1, Vicki A Freedman. 1. Department of Health Systems and Policy, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey School of Public Health, 335 George Street-Suite 2200, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. cornmaje@umdnj.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although racial and ethnic disparities in disability are well established and technology is increasingly used to bridge gaps between functional deficits and environmental demands, little research has focused on racial and ethnic disparities in device use. This study investigated whether use of mobility devices differs by race and ethnicity and explored several reasons for this difference. METHODS: The sample included community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older from the 2002 and 2004 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. We used predisposing, need, and enabling factors to predict mobility device use alone and combined with personal care. RESULT: Blacks had the highest rates of using mobility devices, followed by Hispanics and then Whites. Need and enabling factors explained differences between Blacks and Whites in wheelchair use but not cane use or use of devices without personal care. Other predisposing factors explained most differences between Hispanics and Whites. DISCUSSION: Because minorities appear to be using mobility devices in proportion to underlying need, increasing device use by minorities may not reduce disparities in mobility disability. Efforts to address racial/ethnic disparities in mobility disability in late life, therefore, may need to focus on differences in underlying functional decline rather than the accommodation of it.
OBJECTIVE: Although racial and ethnic disparities in disability are well established and technology is increasingly used to bridge gaps between functional deficits and environmental demands, little research has focused on racial and ethnic disparities in device use. This study investigated whether use of mobility devices differs by race and ethnicity and explored several reasons for this difference. METHODS: The sample included community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older from the 2002 and 2004 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. We used predisposing, need, and enabling factors to predict mobility device use alone and combined with personal care. RESULT: Blacks had the highest rates of using mobility devices, followed by Hispanics and then Whites. Need and enabling factors explained differences between Blacks and Whites in wheelchair use but not cane use or use of devices without personal care. Other predisposing factors explained most differences between Hispanics and Whites. DISCUSSION: Because minorities appear to be using mobility devices in proportion to underlying need, increasing device use by minorities may not reduce disparities in mobility disability. Efforts to address racial/ethnic disparities in mobility disability in late life, therefore, may need to focus on differences in underlying functional decline rather than the accommodation of it.
Authors: Liming Dong; Vicki A Freedman; Brisa N Sánchez; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Nancy M Gell; Robert B Wallace; Andrea Z LaCroix; Tracy M Mroz; Kushang V Patel Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David X Marquez; JoEllen Wilbur; Susan L Hughes; Michael L Berbaum; Robert S Wilson; David M Buchner; Edward McAuley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Amol M Karmarkar; Brad E Dicianno; Rosemarie Cooper; Diane M Collins; Judith T Matthews; Alicia Koontz; Emily E Teodorski; Rory A Cooper Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2011-06-14