Literature DB >> 18331942

Duration of elastomeric separation and effect on interproximal contact point characteristics.

Moshe Davidovitch1, Sophia Papanicolaou, Alexander D Vardimon, Tamar Brosh.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The common protocol of a week-long duration of elastomeric separators to facilitate band placement usually causes discomfort. In this study, we examined the minimum separation time required to create an interproximal space >0.16 mm (band thickness), the interproximal changes over 24 hours after separator removal, and the mechanical characteristics of various separators.
METHODS: Thirty subjects, ages 28.1 +/- 2.8 years, had an elastomeric separator placed between the mandibular second premolar and first molar (CP5-6) for 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours. After separator removal, CP5-6 was measured for space and tightness of dental contact point (TDCP) changes up to 24 hours after separator removal. The mechanical behaviors of 6 manufacturers' separators were compared.
RESULTS: After 12 and 24 hours of separation, all patients demonstrated space >0.16 mm (P <.001). A significant negative correlation (R = -0.59 to -0.63; P = .001) was found between baseline TDCP and the space measured at separator removal. A biphasic viscoelastic recovery (82%-95%) to baseline tightness level occurred within 24 hours. Variation between manufacturers was low (9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Separators should be placed a day before banding. The patient should arrive 3 to 4 hours before the appointment for separator replacement if the separator is lost. Rapid recovery after separation removal implies the biological soundness of elastomeric separation regardless of the manufacturer used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331942     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  The arrangement of the interproximal interfaces in the human permanent dentition.

Authors:  Rachel Sarig; Nikolaos V Lianopoulos; Israel Hershkovitz; Alexander D Vardimon
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The anterior component of occlusal force revisited: direct measurement and theoretical considerations.

Authors:  Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar; Maria Mavragani; Vasilis Psarras; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Assessment of Separation Impact and Perception of Discomfort on Various Orthodontic Separators: A Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  Shaheen Vilayil Shamsuddin; Sami Alshahrani; George Sam; Sumaya Yousuf Jeri; Sriram Kirti Ranjan Bhuyan; Deviprasad Mahanta
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  The biomechanics of Kansal Separator: A '2 in 1' self-secured orthodontic spring separator.

Authors:  Arun Kumar; Sudhanshu Kansal; Vimal Thareja; Gurkeerat Singh; Piush Kumar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-01

5.  Photobiomodulation and Pain Reduction in Patients Requiring Orthodontic Band Application: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Marina Vitale; Antonio Luiz Barbosa Pinheiro; Paola Gandini; Lorenzo Sorrentino; Ugo Matteo Iarussi; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Separation and pain perception of Elastomeric, Kesling and Kansal separators.

Authors:  Tulika Tripathi; Navneet Singh; Priyank Rai; Neha Khanna
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-20

7.  Orthodontic tooth separation activates the hypothalamic area in the human brain.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ariji; Hisataka Kondo; Ken Miyazawa; Masako Tabuchi; Syuji Koyama; Yoshitaka Kise; Akifumi Togari; Shigemi Gotoh; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.344

8.  Effects of acute pain and strain of the periodontium due to orthodontic separation on the occlusal tactile acuity of healthy individuals.

Authors:  Rosaria Bucci; Michail Koutris; Vittorio Simeon; Frank Lobbezoo; Ambrosina Michelotti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.