Literature DB >> 18331116

Operationalizing MTM through the use of health information technology.

Robert McMahan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health information technology (HIT) tools are needed to sort the ever increasing volume of available clinical data, and thereby allow patients, practitioners, and health plans to understand and use the data to its fullest potential By harnessing this potential, managed care organizations (MCOs) will see improvements in the quality of health care and ultimately reduced costs. Furthermore, HIT offers the ability to help improve communication channels to share the increasing amounts of information available to MCOs today. In effect, medication therapy management (MTM) programs are using HIT to identify an at-risk population and reach that population in the most appropriate measure.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and review the design components of an operationally effective MTM program, including the services offered. The use of HIT in quality improvement initiatives at managed care plans will also be reviewed.
SUMMARY: The operational components of MTM programs that rely heavily on HIT include patient identification, stratification of care, coordination of care, and safety evaluation. Primarily, HIT plays a significant role in identifying the services offered to MTM program patients in MCOs. For example, the Humana MTM program offers personalized educational mailings, telephone consultations, and face-to-face consultations with the community pharmacist. Within the plan, HIT is used to score and stratify eligible patients according to these available services. HIT is further employed to coordinate the collective efforts of pharmacists and physicians in the administration of care, as well as to monitor medication safety measures. Health plans gain a greater ability to improve the quality of care for their patients through proper application of HIT. The opportunities exist both internally at the plan and externally partnered with other organizations. Quality improvement begins with proper recording and tracking of quality measures and then the development of quality improvement projects in an effort to improve the process of care and the resulting health outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: As the amount of data available to managed care stakeholders increases, HIT is becoming a crucial tool for sorting and stratifying the information. MTM programs provide another example of the application of HIT in managed care, with involvement on every level of the care continuum: payers, providers, and patients. Services offered by MTM programs are useful and varied, including process-improving initiatives, such as personalized educational mailings, telephone consultations, and face-to-face consultations with the community pharmacist. The end result is quality improvement in the delivery of care with a focus on improving medication adherence and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18331116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  8 in total

1.  Use of an automated clinical management system improves outpatient immunosuppressive care following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Esther S Park; Marie R Peccoud; Kay A Wicks; Jeffrey B Halldorson; Robert L Carithers; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Medication therapy management goes hi-tech: implementing automated software improves pharmacy efficiency.

Authors:  Adrienne Giordano; Carrie Holden; Cathrine Misquitta
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2008-10

Review 3.  New models of chronic kidney disease care including pharmacists: improving medication reconciliation and medication management.

Authors:  Wendy L St Peter; Lori D Wazny; Uptal D Patel
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Challenges to integrating pharmacogenetic testing into medication therapy management.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Jivan Moaddeb
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2015-04

5.  Patient completion of laboratory tests to monitor medication therapy: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Shira H Fischer; Terry S Field; Shawn J Gagne; Kathleen M Mazor; Peggy Preusse; George Reed; Daniel Peterson; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jennifer Tjia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Medication therapy management services: definitions and outcomes.

Authors:  Annette N Pellegrino; Michelle T Martin; Jessica J Tilton; Daniel R Touchette
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The impact of medication therapy management in older oncology patients.

Authors:  Ting Ting Yeoh; Phebe Si; Lita Chew
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Potential value of electronic prescribing in health economic and outcomes research.

Authors:  Catherine E Cooke; Brian J Isetts; Thomas E Sullivan; Maren Fustgaard; Daniel A Belletti
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-11-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.