Literature DB >> 1833042

A phase III comparison trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and caffeine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

D Kelsen1, C Hudis, D Niedzwiecki, J Dougherty, E Casper, J Botet, V Vinciguerra, R Rosenbluth.   

Abstract

Conventional chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has had little effect on palliation or survival. Almost all studies of systemic therapy have involved empiric use of a variety of Phase II or conventional agents alone or in combination. On the basis of recent studies using a human tumor pancreatic cancer (PC) xenograft in nude mice, a Phase I clinical trial of cisplatin, high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), and caffeine (CAC) was performed in patients with advanced incurable PC. A tolerable dose and schedule of the three agents were developed. Seven of 18 patients with measurable disease in this Phase I trial had partial responses to CAC. A Phase III comparison of CAC versus standard treatment using streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) was performed. Eighty-two patients with advanced PC were entered into this random assignment trial. The two treatment arms were well balanced for the usual prognostic factors. Although the acute (e.g., nausea and vomiting) toxicities of CAC were greater than those of SMF, both groups of patients tolerated treatment resonably well. Ninety percent of patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (5.5%) on the CAC treatment arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 15%) and four patients (10.2%) on the SMF treatment arm (95% CI, 1% to 22%) had objective responses (partial response in measurable disease or improvement in evaluable disease). No complete remissions were observed. The 95% confidence limits of response for CAC and SMF overlapped. The median duration of survival for all patients on the SMF treatment arm was 10 months, although it was 5 months on the CAC treatment arm (P = 0.008). In this Phase III comparison, CAC was not superior to conventional therapy with SMF in terms of response and was inferior for survival. Neither regimen is effective treatment for advanced PC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1833042     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910901)68:5<965::aid-cncr2820680509>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Best supportive care of pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  K Schoppmeyer; J Mössner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  D-Amino acid oxidase-induced oxidative stress, 3-bromopyruvate and citrate inhibit angiogenesis, exhibiting potent anticancer effects.

Authors:  S M El Sayed; R M Abou El-Magd; Y Shishido; K Yorita; S P Chung; D H Tran; T Sakai; H Watanabe; S Kagami; K Fukui
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 3.  Update on the role of nanoliposomal irinotecan in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Fnu Asad Ur Rahman; Saeed Ali; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Investigational Strategies for Detection and Intervention in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer. April 24-27, Annapolis, Maryland. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec

5.  Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ben Lawrence; Michael Findlay
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 6.  [Therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  M Böhmig; B Wiedenmann; S Rosewicz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-11-15

Review 7.  Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer using monoclonal antibodies and immune response modifiers.

Authors:  H Friess; M Gassmann; M W Büchler
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1997-02

8.  Treatment with an oral fluoropyrimidine, S-1, plus cisplatin in patients who failed postoperative gemcitabine treatment for pancreatic cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Akira Togawa; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Hiroshi Ito; Fumio Kimura; Hiroaki Shimizu; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Hiroyuki Yoshidome; Atsushi Kato; Shigeaki Sawada; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  5-Fluorouracil plus 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in advanced pancreatic cancer. GLISP (Gruppo Ligure Studio Pancreas).

Authors:  E Bolli; S Saccomanno; G Mondini; C Aschele; A Guglielmi; B Ligas; M Connio; A Mori; R Rosso; A Sobrero
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Moss; Clifton Lee
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.