Literature DB >> 18329811

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of coprological and serological techniques for the diagnosis of fasciolosis in cattle.

Johannes Charlier1, Luc De Meulemeester, Edwin Claerebout, Diana Williams, Jozef Vercruysse.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate available coprological and serological tests for detection of Fasciola hepatica infection in field conditions, (2) to investigate if the season when samples were collected affects the interpretation of the test results, and (3) to evaluate if the test results are associated with the level of infection. During weekly visits to an abattoir, the whole liver, a rectal faecal sample and a blood sample were collected from 100 cows in two seasons each ("spring"=February-May 2006 and "autumn"=October-December 2006). A sedimentation-flotation technique on 4g (SF 4g) or 10g (SF 10g) of faeces, a copro-antigen ELISA and two indirect serum F. hepatica ELISAs (excretory-secretory (ES) and Pourquier ELISA) were performed and the test results were compared with the presence of infection and worm counts at liver necropsy. Over both seasons the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were for the SF 4g 43% and 100%, for the SF 10g 64% and 93%, for the copro-antigen ELISA 94% and 93%, for the ES ELISA 87% and 90% and for the Pourquier ELISA 88% and 84%. Significant between-season differences (P<0.05) were observed in the sensitivities of the two serological ELISAs: whereas the Pourquier ELISA had a higher sensitivity in spring than in autumn, the opposite was true for the ES ELISA. There were no significant between-season differences in the specificity for any of the tests. The test results of the SF 4g, copro-antigen ELISA and ES ELISA were associated with the level of infection of the animal. Given a positive test result of the SF 4g it is at least 11 times more likely that the animal is carrying a heavy infection (>10 flukes) than that is free of infection or lightly infected (< or = 10 flukes). Weak ( approximately 0.3) and moderate ( approximately 0.6) correlations were observed within infected animals of level of infection with ES and copro-antigen ELISA results, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329811     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  30 in total

1.  Comparison between in-house indirect ELISA and Dot-ELISA for the diagnosis of Fasciola gigantica in cattle.

Authors:  Jafar Arjmand Yamchi; Nasser Hajipour; Seyyed Meysam Abtahi Froushani; Mojtaba Keighobadi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2015-06-23

2.  Development and evaluation of a single-step duplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica (family Fasciolidae, class Trematoda, phylum Platyhelminthes).

Authors:  Thanh Hoa Le; Khue Thi Nguyen; Nga Thi Bich Nguyen; Huong Thi Thanh Doan; Xuyen Thi Kim Le; Chau Thi Minh Hoang; Nguyen Van De
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Fasciolosis-An Increasing Challenge in the Sheep Industry.

Authors:  Snorre Stuen; Cecilie Ersdal
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  The role of Ser-(Arg-Ser-Arg-Ser-GlucNAc)19-GlucNAc Fasciola gigantica glycoprotein in the diagnosis of prepatent fasciolosis in rabbits.

Authors:  Eman H Abdel-Rahman; Azza H Mohamed; Adel A H Abdel-Rahman; Eman E El Shanawany
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2014-04-26

5.  Detections of gastrointestinal parasites, including Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp., in cattle of Banten province, Indonesia.

Authors:  Dyah Haryuningtyas Sawitri; April Hari Wardhana; Eny Martindah; Fitrine Ekawasti; Dias Aprita Dewi; Bambang Ngaji Utomo; Tomoyuki Shibahara; Masahiro Kusumoto; Masaharu Tokoro; Kazumi Sasai; Makoto Matsubayashi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  Field evaluation of a coproantigen detection test for fascioliasis diagnosis and surveillance in human hyperendemic areas of Andean countries.

Authors:  María Adela Valero; María Victoria Periago; Ignacio Pérez-Crespo; René Angles; Fidel Villegas; Carlos Aguirre; Wilma Strauss; José R Espinoza; Patricia Herrera; Angelica Terashima; Hugo Tamayo; Dirk Engels; Albis Francesco Gabrielli; Santiago Mas-Coma
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-09-13

7.  Development of a multiplex fluorescence immunological assay for the simultaneous detection of antibodies against Cooperia oncophora, Dictyocaulus viviparus and Fasciola hepatica in cattle.

Authors:  Sofia N Karanikola; Jürgen Krücken; Sabrina Ramünke; Theo de Waal; Johan Höglund; Johannes Charlier; Corinna Weber; Elisabeth Müller; Slawomir J Kowalczyk; Jaroslaw Kaba; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Janina Demeler
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Determining the Prevalence and Seasonality of Fasciola hepatica in Pasture-based Dairy herds in Ireland using a Bulk Tank Milk ELISA.

Authors:  Yris Bloemhoff; Andrew Forbes; Martin Danaher; Barbara Good; Eric Morgan; Grace Mulcahy; Mary Sekiya; Ríona Sayers
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  Integrating fasciolosis control in the dry cow management: the effect of closantel treatment on milk production.

Authors:  Johannes Charlier; Miel Hostens; Jos Jacobs; Bonny Van Ranst; Luc Duchateau; Jozef Vercruysse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bovine fasciolosis at increasing altitudes: parasitological and malacological sampling on the slopes of Mount Elgon, Uganda.

Authors:  Alison Howell; Lawrence Mugisha; Juliet Davies; E James LaCourse; Jennifer Claridge; Diana J L Williams; Louise Kelly-Hope; Martha Betson; Narcis B Kabatereine; J Russell Stothard
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.