Literature DB >> 18329460

Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.

Eric S Weiss1, David D Chang, David L Joyce, Lois U Nwakanma, David D Yuh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing for coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction is not well established. The California Discharge Database facilitates the study of this issue by providing data from a large patient cohort free of institutional bias. We examine the timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction on short-term outcomes.
METHODS: We reviewed California Discharge Data to identify 40,159 patients who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (day 0) and underwent subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were stratified by the timing of coronary artery bypass grafting to "early" (days 0-2) and "late" groups (day 3 or later). The primary outcome variable was all-cause hospital mortality. Multiple logistic and linear regression and propensity analyses assessed the risk of adverse events, controlling for factors associated with preoperative clinical acuity, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, shock, mechanical ventilation, and the use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
RESULTS: Of 9476 patients identified, 4676 (49%) were in the early coronary artery bypass grafting group and 4800 (51%) were in the late coronary artery bypass grafting group. A total of 444 patients (4.7%) died during hospitalization, with a peak mortality rate of 8.2% among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting on day 0, declining to a nadir of 3.0% among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting on day 3. The mean time to coronary artery bypass grafting was 3.2 days. Patients undergoing early coronary artery bypass grafting experienced a higher mortality rate than those undergoing late coronary artery bypass grafting (5.6% vs 3.8%, P < .001). Early coronary artery bypass grafting was an independent predictor of mortality after controlling for clinical acuity and on propensity analysis (odds ratio 1.43, P = .003).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting within 2 days of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction experienced higher mortality rates than those undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting 3 or more days after acute myocardial infarction, independently of clinical acuity. This suggests that coronary artery bypass grafting may best be deferred for 3 or more days after admission for acute myocardial infarction in nonurgent cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  19 in total

Review 1.  Revascularization Strategies for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Bennet George; Naoki Misumida; Khaled M Ziada
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Outcomes of non-elective coronary artery bypass grafting performed on weekends.

Authors:  Jared P Beller; William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Elizabeth D Krebs; Alan M Speir; Mohammed A Quader; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi; Nicholas R Teman
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Y L Gu; I C C van der Horst; Y L Douglas; T Svilaas; M A Mariani; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Does Preoperative Troponin Level Impact Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Damien J LaPar; Irving L Kron; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi; Ravi K Ghanta
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Gabriele Pesarini; Francesco Santini; Giulia Geremia; Carlo Zivelonghi; Flavio Ribichini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Recurrent post-partum coronary artery dissection.

Authors:  Taufiek K Rajab; Zain Khalpey; Bernhard Kraemer; Frederic S Resnic; Robert P Gallegos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 7.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Validity and utility of ICD-10 administrative health data for identifying ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on physician chart review.

Authors:  Alka B Patel; Hude Quan; Robert C Welsh; Jessica Deckert-Sookram; Wayne Tymchak; Sunil Sookram; Ian Surdhar; Padma Kaul
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-10-02

9.  Impact of an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and erythropoietin on experimental myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Christina Grothusen; Angelika Hagemann; Tim Attmann; Jan Braesen; Ole Broch; Jochen Cremer; Jan Schoettler
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

10.  Immediate surgical coronary revascularisation in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nawid Khaladj; Dmitry Bobylev; Sven Peterss; Sabina Guenther; Maximilian Pichlmaier; Erik Bagaev; Andreas Martens; Malakh Shrestha; Axel Haverich; Christian Hagl
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.