Literature DB >> 18329408

Differences of drivers' reaction times according to age and mental workload.

Hiroshi Makishita1, Katsuya Matsunaga.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine differences in reaction times of drivers of various age groups and to assess the influence of mental workload on reaction times. Experiments were performed on a simulated street and under other conditions to identify drivers with long reaction times and drivers whose reaction times are affected strongly by mental workloads while driving on a public road. Reaction times after hearing a buzzer were measured under five conditions: (1) sitting in a stationary vehicle, (2) executing mental calculations in a stationary vehicle, (3) driving on a simulated street, (4) executing mental calculations while driving on a simulated street, and (5) driving on a public road. Subjects were 10 drivers each of three age groups. Each experiment was performed by these subjects under the five conditions. Results showed that mental calculations increased the average reaction time for each age group. Mental calculations increased differences among age groups and individuals, and increased differences in respective drivers' individual performance. Mental calculations influenced elderly drivers' reaction times remarkably. Results also demonstrated that an experiment on a simulated street identified drivers who showed long reaction times on a public road.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18329408     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

Review 1.  Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition.

Authors:  Luca Longo; Christoper D Wickens; Gabriella Hancock; Peter A Hancock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Correlation between driving-related skill and alcohol use in young-adults from six European countries: the TEN-D by Night Project.

Authors:  Roberta Siliquini; Fabrizio Bert; Francisco Alonso; Paola Berchialla; Alessandra Colombo; Axel Druart; Marcin Kedzia; Valeria Siliquini; Daniel Vankov; Anita Villerusa; Lamberto Manzoli
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Research on the Relationship between Reaction Ability and Mental State for Online Assessment of Driving Fatigue.

Authors:  Mengzhu Guo; Shiwu Li; Linhong Wang; Meng Chai; Facheng Chen; Yunong Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Work Ability and Vitality in Coach Drivers: An RCT to Study the Effectiveness of a Self-Management Intervention during the Peak Season.

Authors:  Art van Schaaijk; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Monique Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.

Authors:  Jesse Michaels; Romain Chaumillon; David Nguyen-Tri; Donald Watanabe; Pierro Hirsch; Francois Bellavance; Guillaume Giraudet; Delphine Bernardin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Chang Wang; Rui Fu; Qinyu Sun; Hongjia Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.