Literature DB >> 18329349

VATS pericardiotomy for patients with known malignancy and pericardial effusion: survival and prognosis of positive cytology and metastatic involvement of the pericardium: a case control study.

Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab1, Philip A Linden, Christopher T Ducko, Raphael Bueno, William G Richards, David J Sugarbaker, Michael T Jaklitsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pericardiotomy for cancer patients with effusion can alleviate symptoms, but with unclear effect on long term survival. Our experience with VATS technique has produced some long-term survivors.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 62 VATS pericardiotomy for pericardial effusion in patients with known malignancy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS: The mean age was 54.8+/-14.3 years (ranging from 19 to 79). The mean hospital stay was 8.7+/-5.5 days. The median survival was 6.75 months (range 1 month-10 years). Overall one-year survival was 44.2%, 3-year survival 17.6%, and 5-year survival 10% after drainage of pericardial effusion. The mean survival in cytology negative patients (n=21) was 13.4+/-0.98 months, compared to 4.89+/-0.9 months in cytology positive patients (n=27) (p=0.0175). The 5-year survival in cytology negative patients was 19.6%, while none of the patients with positive cytology were alive after 36 months. The mean survival in patients with no evidence of metastatic disease on the pericardium (n=28) was 12.8+/-0.9 months, compared to patients with metastatic disease of the pericardium (n=22) 4.66+/-0.8 months (p=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: VATS Pericardiotomy can provide effective long-term drainage in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion. Positive cytology and metastatic involvement of the pericardium are predictive of worse survival. Survival greater than 5 years can be expected in 19% and 17% of patients with negative fluid cytology and negative metastatic disease of the pericardium, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcomes after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pericardiectomy for Pericardial Effusion.

Authors:  Yasushi Mizukami; Nobuhito Ueda; Hirofumi Adachi; Jun Arikura; Keishi Kondo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 2.  Management of Malignant Pericardial Effusion.

Authors:  Mary Petrofsky
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  The Value of Cytology in the Evaluation of Malignant Pericardial Effusions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranim Shartouni; Roy Shartouni; Maryam Mahmoodi; Ilias P Nikas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Life-Threatening Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to COVID-19 Treated with Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Rawand Abdulrahman Essa; Sirwan Khalid Ahmed
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-09

5.  Comparison of acute phase reaction and postoperative stress in pigs undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy pneumonectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Liu; Li Gao; Tao Liu; Hong-Bin Wang
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 1.695

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.