Literature DB >> 18329076

Evaluation of efficacy of novel optically activated digital endoscope protection system against laser energy damage.

Clifford Sung1, Harmanmeet Singh, Marissa Schwartz, Gabriella Mirabile, Gregory W Hruby, Caroline D Ryan, Jaime Landman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and efficacy of a novel endoscope protection system (EPS) against direct laser energy damage.
METHODS: We performed in vitro evaluations of a novel EPS prototype that uses optical feedback from the digital sensor of the DUR-D ureteroscope to terminate the laser energy on retraction of the laser fiber into the ureteroscope. We evaluated various speeds of retraction (0.5, 2.0, and 5.0 cm/s) in normal saline and various concentrations of indigo carmine and human blood. We also evaluated the protrusion distance at which shutdown occurred with the laser fiber cladding cleaved at 0, 3, and 5 mm from the end of the fiber. Twenty trials of each condition were performed.
RESULTS: In normal saline and blood dilutions of up to 10 g/L, the EPS worked with 100% efficiency for all trials. For blood dilutions of 10 g/L or greater and indigo carmine concentrations of 0.16 g/L or greater, the reliability of the EPS deteriorated. Lasers stripped of 0, 3, and 5 mm of cladding initiated shutdown at 2.9 +/- 0.13, 5.1 +/- 0.09, and 8.2 +/- 0.15 mm from the ureteroscope distal end, respectively (P <0.01). A single DUR-D ureteroscope was used for all trials and remained completely intact through 120 retractions of the active laser fiber into the channel.
CONCLUSIONS: In this evaluation, the novel EPS was highly effective and reliable. When using indigo carmine or high-density blood concentrations, the efficacy of the EPS was compromised. The EPS should be used to complement standard safe laser technique rather than to replace it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329076     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Where next for the endoscope?

Authors:  Ricardo A Natalin; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of laser fiber degradation and perioperative outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using 550 and 1000 µm fiber diameters.

Authors:  Charles U Nottingham; Tim Large; Joshua Heiman; Chanel A Stephens; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Advances in ureteroscopy.

Authors:  David R Wetherell; Damien Ling; Darren Ow; Bhawanie Koonjbeharry; Ania Sliwinski; Mahesha Weerakoon; Nathan Papa; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-09

Review 5.  Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.