Literature DB >> 18328666

Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Preclose technique.

W Anthony Lee1, Michael P Brown, Peter R Nelson, Thomas S Huber, James M Seeger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous access during endovascular aortic repair has been shown to be feasible and safe using a suture-mediated closure device ("Preclose" technique) for closure of up to 24F introducer sheaths. The purpose of this study is to examine the late outcomes of those femoral arteries repaired in this manner.
METHODS: The Preclose technique has been previously described. Briefly, the technique involves two Perclose Proglide devices deployed in the femoral artery prior to insertion of the large diameter introducer sheath and then closure of the arteriotomy by tying down knots of the Proglide following removal of the sheath. The medical records of all patients who underwent endovascular aortic repairs using the Preclose technique between December 2004 and August 2007 were reviewed. Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms performed at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. All Preclose patients who had at least a 6-month postoperative scan were included in the study. For each patient, the most recent postoperative scan was compared with the preoperative scan for evidence of any new anatomic abnormalities of the femoral artery such as dissection, stenosis, or pseudoaneurysm. Three-dimensional post processing with multiplanar reconstructions was also performed as necessary to confirm axial scan findings.
RESULTS: A total of 292 patients underwent percutaneous endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR-125, EVAR-167). Four hundred thirty-two femoral arteries were closed with 870 devices. Four hundred eighteen vessels were approximated with two devices, while 30 arteries required three devices for hemostasis and an additional four vessels only required a single device. Two hundred seventy-eight (64.3%) vessels were accessed with sheaths 18 to 24F. Four hundred eight femoral arteries (94.4%) were closed successfully with the Preclose technique. There were 100 patients (TEVAR-35, EVAR-65) who had adequate postoperative CT scan at 6-months or later. The mean follow up was 11.6 +/- 5.0 months. Of the 156 femoral arteries in these 100 patients repaired using the Preclose technique, there were 3 late complications in 3 patients, 1 asymptomatic femoral artery dissection, and 2 femoral artery pseudoaneurysms requiring surgical repair, resulting in a late complication rate of 1.92% (3/156).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous closure of femoral arteries after large diameter introducer sheaths using the Preclose technique has a low incidence of early and late complications related to the closure site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18328666     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  26 in total

1.  Current status of percutaneous endografting.

Authors:  Bulent Arslan; Ulku C Turba; Saher Sabri; J Fritz Angle; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Percutaneous access planning, techniques and considerations for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).

Authors:  Geogy Vatakencherry; Chris Molloy; Neil Sheth; Millie Liao; Cuong Ken Lam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

3.  Endovascular stent grafts in urgent blunt and penetrating thoracic aortic trauma.

Authors:  Kenneth J Kolbeck; John A Kaufman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not contraindicated in obese patients.

Authors:  Jason Zakko; Salvatore Scali; Adam W Beck; Charles T Klodell; Thomas M Beaver; Tomas D Martin; Thomas S Huber; Robert J Feezor
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  A prospective, non-randomized comparison of SAPIEN XT and CoreValve implantation in two sequential cohorts of patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Albert Markus Kasel; Salvatore Cassese; Thomas Ischinger; Alexander Leber; Diethmar Antoni; Gotthard Riess; Jayshree Vogel; Adnan Kastrati; Walter Eichinger; Ellen Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28

Review 6.  Percutaneous management of vascular access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ilaria Dato; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Filippo Crea; Gian Paolo Ussia
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

7.  A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR.

Authors:  Sergio Petronelli; Maria Teresa Zurlo; Silvia Giambersio; Lucia Danieli; Mariaelena Occhipinti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Eleonora G Karthaus; Peter A Soden; Klaas H J Ultee; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Combined open and endovascular repair for aortic arch pathology.

Authors:  Woong Chol Kang; Eak Kyun Shin; Tae Hoon Ahn; Kyung Hoon Lee; Chan Il Moon; Seung Hwan Han; Chul-Hyun Park; Kook-Yang Park; Jin Mo Kang; Jung Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Standard of practice for the endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and type B dissections.

Authors:  Fabrizio Fanelli; Michael D Dake
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.