Literature DB >> 18328236

Effect of thickness of cavity wall on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations.

F Mazhari1, M Gharaghahi.   

Abstract

AIM: This was to evaluate the effect of different thicknesses of cavity walls on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations.
METHODS: 80 carious extracted human primary molar teeth were selected for pulpotomy preparation. The teeth were divided into four groups. Mesio- or disto-occlusal (20 teeth) and mesio-occluso-distal (20 teeth); cavities were prepared in both first and second primary molar teeth. Each group was divided into two subgroups of ten teeth according to the thickness of their walls (1.5 or 2.5 mm). After restoring teeth with amalgam, all groups were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for seven days. They were then thermo cycled 1,000 times between 5 degrees to 55 degrees C. The specimens were then subjected to a compressive axial load in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min(-1). The t-test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Mean fracture resistances of the first and second molar teeth were 975.5 +/- 368.8 and 1049.2 +/- 540.1, respectively. In the first molars, fracture resistance of 2-surface cavities was significantly more than 3-surface cavities (p=0.001), but this difference was not statistically significant in second molars. In second molars, fracture strength in 2- and 3-surface cavities with a 2.5 mm thickness in the walls was more than those with 1.5 mm thickness. However, in first molars this difference was only statistically significant in 3-surface cavities (p=0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: The fracture strength in pulpotomized primary molar teeth with amalgam restorations was high, more than maximum bite forces in primary teeth, even in extensive 3- surface cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18328236     DOI: 10.1007/bf03321593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  20 in total

1.  Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations.

Authors:  R Pilo; T Brosh; H Chweidan
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Fracture strength of premolars with Class 2 silver amalgam restorations.

Authors:  M H el-Sherif; M N Halhoul; A A Kamar; A Nour el-Din
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 3.  Bite force and chewing efficiency.

Authors:  G E Carlsson
Journal:  Front Oral Physiol       Date:  1974

4.  Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  D Assif; C Gorfil
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture.

Authors:  P K Blaser; M R Lund; M A Cochran; R H Potter
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  A study on the measurement of occlusal force and masticatory efficiency in school age Japanese children.

Authors:  K Maki; T Nishioka; A Morimoto; M Naito; M Kimura
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Resistance to fracture of teeth with various preparations for amalgam.

Authors:  G A Caron; D F Murchison; R B Cohen; J C Broome
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Craniofacial morphology, occlusal traits, and bite force in persons with advanced occlusal tooth wear.

Authors:  S Kiliaridis; A Johansson; T Haraldson; R Omar; G E Carlsson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements.

Authors:  V L Ortega; L F Pegoraro; P C R Conti; A L do Valle; G Bonfante
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.

Authors:  Jale Görücü; Gül Ozgünaltay
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques.

Authors:  Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari; Amir Ghasemi; Arash Yousefi Moradi; Khashayar Sanjari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-12-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.