Literature DB >> 18328164

Joint hypermobility in Indian children.

R P Hasija1, R P Khubchandani, S Shenoi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of joint hypermobility in children from Mumbai, India and to study its association with malnutrition.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional field study from September '02 to February '03 in Mumbai, 829 children of the lower urban socio-economic strata, between 3 and 19 years of age were evaluated independently by two observers for hypermobility using the Beighton 9-point scoring system. A score of >or= 4/9 was considered positive. Their nutritional status was stratified using standard Indian growth charts and hypermobility was quantified in various nutritional groups. Musculoskeletal symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire given to parents. Standard tests of significance (Chi square test, p<0.05-significant) were applied.
RESULTS: 58.7% of the population studied, had a Beighton score >or= 4/9. There was a declining prevalence of joint hypermobility noted with increasing age. Near equal sex incidence was noted. A higher incidence of finger signs was noted in comparison to elbow hyperextension, knee hyperextension and hands-to-floor. 26% of the hypermobile population had musculoskeletal symptoms as compared with 17.2% of the non-hypermobile population (p<0.05). A positive Beighton score was found in 452/734 (61.5%) children with Grade 3 and 4 malnutrition in comparison to 35/95 (36.8%) children with normal nutrition or mild grades (Grade 1 and 2) of malnutrition (p<0.05). In the group with Grade 3 and 4 malnutrition, 26.1% of those hypermobile had musculoskeletal symptoms in comparison to 17.7% of their non-hypermobile counterparts (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In our study population: 1. A high prevalence of hypermobility using Beighton's score was noted; 2. Finger signs of the Beighton score were more common than the other signs; 3. Moderate and severe malnutrition were associated with hypermobility; 4. Musculoskeletal symptoms were linked to joint hypermobility; 5. Moderate and severely malnourished hypermobile children were more likely to have musculoskeletal symptoms as compared to their non-hypermobile counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18328164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  10 in total

1.  Hypermobility Frequency in School Children: Relationship With Idiopathic Scoliosis, Age, Sex and Musculoskeletal Problems.

Authors:  Sinem Bozkurt; Gülseren Kayalar; Nihal Tezel; Tuba Güler; Bilge Kesikburun; Merve Denizli; Sefa Tan; Hürriyet Yilmaz
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.472

Review 2.  Difficulty eating and significant weight loss in joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type.

Authors:  Carolina Baeza-Velasco; Thomas Van den Bossche; Daniel Grossin; Claude Hamonet
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Epidemiology of generalized joint laxity (hypermobility) in fourteen-year-old children from the UK: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Jacqui Clinch; Kevin Deere; Adrian Sayers; Shea Palmer; Chris Riddoch; Jonathan H Tobias; Emma M Clark
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-09

4.  Are Indian patients with juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis taller than reference population ?

Authors:  Pulukool Sandhya; Debashish Danda; Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention strategy for the treatment of symptomatic joint hypermobility in childhood: a randomised, single Centre parallel group trial (The Bendy Study).

Authors:  Peter Bale; Vicky Easton; Holly Bacon; Emma Jerman; Laura Watts; Garry Barton; Allan Clark; Kate Armon; Alex J MacGregor
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.054

6.  Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students.

Authors:  Peter R Reuter; Kaylee R Fichthorn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Prevalence of joint hypermobility in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amir Sobhani-Eraghi; Mohsen Motalebi; Siavash Sarreshtehdari; Borzooyeh Molazem-Sanandaji; Zahra Hasanlu
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Exercise in children with joint hypermobility syndrome and knee pain: a randomised controlled trial comparing exercise into hypermobile versus neutral knee extension.

Authors:  Verity Pacey; Louise Tofts; Roger D Adams; Craig F Munns; Leslie L Nicholson
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Joint hypermobility in children with and without functional constipation.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Fatemi Khorasgani; Neda Ramezani; Negar Ebrahimi Varnousfaderani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Oxidative Stress and Musculoskeletal Pain in University Students with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ahmad H Alghadir; Sami A Gabr; Muaz Al-Ghadir
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.