Literature DB >> 18327969

Gow-Gates technique: a pilot study for extraction procedures with clinical evaluation and review.

Bernhard Rolf Kohler1, Loreto Castellón, Germán Laissle.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2 different volumes of anesthetic solution for a premolar-molar extraction, and to determine the onset of complete mandibular conduction anesthesia via a Gow-Gates mandibular block. One operator performed 32 blocks with a 27-gauge needle on patients who required a dental extraction: 16 blocks using 1.8 mL of anesthetic solution, and 16 blocks using 3.6 mL of anesthetic solution. The parameters evaluated were frequency of successful anesthesia and onset of complete anesthesia. Significant differences (P < .005) were observed in the evaluation of volume: the 3.6 mL group yielded a higher success rate (82.5%) than the 1.8 mL group (17.5%). The onset of complete conduction anesthesia was achieved in 8 minutes by 56% of the subjects (9 of 16) with 3.6 mL and only one subject in 16 (6%) with 1.8 mL. A larger volume of anesthetic solution (3.6 mL) is required to achieve a higher success rate and a faster onset of action for a dental extraction without the use of reinforcement anesthesia. The volume of anesthetic solution is indirectly proportional to the onset of complete anesthesia. A premolar-molar extraction can be done, with 3.6 mL of anesthetic solution, in more than 50% of the patients 8 minutes after injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327969      PMCID: PMC2268886          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[2:GTAPSF]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  22 in total

1.  Neural blockade by local anesthetics.

Authors:  R H de Jong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A clinical evaluation of the Gow-Gates mandibular block technique.

Authors:  J E Watson; G A Gow-Gates
Journal:  N Z Dent J       Date:  1976-10

3.  Practical technics in administration of local anesthetic agents; questions and answers.

Authors:  P M NORTHROP
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1949-04       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  The Gow-Gates mandibular block: further understanding.

Authors:  G A Gow-Gates; J E Watson
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

5.  Clinical evaluation of mandibular conduction anesthesia.

Authors:  W D Robertson
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct

6.  Appendix: some anatomic aspects of the Gow-Gates technique for mandibular anesthesia.

Authors:  J E Watson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1973-09

7.  Mandibular conduction anesthesia: a new technique using extraoral landmarks.

Authors:  G A Gow-Gates
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1973-09

8.  The inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle at the mandibular foramen.

Authors:  T R Murphy; E M Grundy
Journal:  Dent Pract Dent Rec       Date:  1969-10

9.  The Gow-Gates mandibular block. Evaluation after 4,275 cases.

Authors:  S F Malamed
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1981-05

10.  Mechanisms for differential block among single myelinated and non-myelinated axons by procaine.

Authors:  D N Franz; R S Perry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Efficacy of Classical and Gow-Gates Technique for Providing Anesthesia During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Split Mouth Design.

Authors:  Nanjappa Madan; Kateel Shashidhara Kamath; A L Gopinath; A Yashvanth; Nagaraj Vaibhav; G Praveen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolina-Noemi Cavallini; Jorge Toledano-Serrabona; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Inferior alveolar nerve block: Alternative technique.

Authors:  K Thangavelu; R Kannan; N Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jan-Jun

4.  Anesthetic technique for inferior alveolar nerve block: a new approach.

Authors:  Dafna Geller Palti; Cristiane Machado de Almeida; Antonio de Castro Rodrigues; Jesus Carlos Andreo; José Eduardo Oliveira Lima
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kiatanant Boonsiriseth; Sittipong Chaimanakarn; Prued Chewpreecha; Natee Nonpassopon; Manop Khanijou; Bushara Ping; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-03-27

6.  Single-insertion technique for anesthetizing the inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve, and long buccal nerve for extraction of mandibular first and second molars: a prospective study.

Authors:  Benny Joseph; Nithin Kumar; Suresh Vyloppilli; Shermil Sayd; K P Manojkumar; Depesh Vijaykumar
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Comparative Evaluation of Classical Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Gow-gates Nerve Block for Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Abhilash Mathews Thomas; Ummar Mangalath; Roshni Abida; Sachin Aslam; Sooraj Soman; Rakesh B Nair
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Stumbling block for inferior alveolar nerve block in predoctoral students: An analytical observational study and review of literature of mandibular nerve block techniques.

Authors:  Suhael Ahmed; Nafeesa Tabassum; Omar Al Dayel; Badr Bamusa; Meer Zakirulla; Fatima Abdullah Binyahya
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.