Literature DB >> 18327908

Collagen-based biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds: preparation and characterization of collagen/silk fibroin bicomponent nanofibrous structures.

In-Sung Yeo1, Ju-Eun Oh, Lim Jeong, Taek Seung Lee, Seung Jin Lee, Won Ho Park, Byung-Moo Min.   

Abstract

Electrospinning of collagen (COL)/silk fibroin (SF) blend solutions in 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol was investigated for fabrication of a biocompatible and biomimetic nanostructured scaffold for tissue engineering. The morphology of the electrospun COL/SF blend nanofibers was observed by scanning electron microscopy. The average diameters of COL/SF blend fibers ranged from 320 to 360 nm, irrespective of SF content in the blends. Both COL and SF components in the as-spun COL/SF blend matrices were stabilized by glutaraldehyde and water vapor, respectively, under the saturated glutaraldehyde aqueous solution at 25 degrees C. The glutaraldehyde vapor chemically stabilized the COL component via cross-linking, whereas the water vapor physically stabilized the SF component via crystallization to the beta-sheet structure. These structural changes of after-treated COL/SF blend matrices were examined using ATR-IR and CP/MAS (13)C NMR spectroscopy. To assay the cytocompatibility and cellular behavior of the COL/SF blend nanofibrous scaffolds, cell attachment and the spreading of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and fibroblasts (NHEF) seeded on the scaffolds were studied. In addition, both morphological changes and cellular responses of COL/SF blend nanofibrous matrices were also compared with COL/SF hybrid nanofibrous matrices. Generally similar levels of cell attachment and spreading of NHEF were shown in the COL/SF blend nanofibrous matrix compared with those of the pure COL and pure SF matrices; the cellular responses of NHEK were, however, markedly decreased in the COL/SF blend nanofibrous matrix as compared to the pure matrices. In contrast, cell attachment and spreading of NHEK on the COL/SF hybrid nanofibrous matrix were significantly higher than that of the COL/SF blend nanofibrous matrix. Our results indicate that a COL/SF hybrid nanofibrous matrix may be a better candidate than a COL/SF blend nanofibrous matrix for biomedical applications such as wound dressing and scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327908     DOI: 10.1021/bm700875a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomacromolecules        ISSN: 1525-7797            Impact factor:   6.988


  29 in total

Review 1.  Enabling individualized therapy through nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jason H Sakamoto; Anne L van de Ven; Biana Godin; Elvin Blanco; Rita E Serda; Alessandro Grattoni; Arturas Ziemys; Ali Bouamrani; Tony Hu; Shivakumar I Ranganathan; Enrica De Rosa; Jonathan O Martinez; Christine A Smid; Rachel M Buchanan; Sei-Young Lee; Srimeenakshi Srinivasan; Matthew Landry; Anne Meyn; Ennio Tasciotti; Xuewu Liu; Paolo Decuzzi; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures.

Authors:  Koyal Garg; Gary L Bowlin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Tissue engineering of oral mucosa: a shared concept with skin.

Authors:  Beste Kinikoglu; Odile Damour; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Will silk fibroin nanofiber scaffolds ever hold a useful place in Translational Regenerative Medicine?

Authors:  Armato Ubaldo; Dal Prà Ilaria; Chiarini Anna; Freddi Giuliano
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2011-09-03

Review 5.  A review of combined experimental and computational procedures for assessing biopolymer structure-process-property relationships.

Authors:  Greta Gronau; Sreevidhya T Krishnaji; Michelle E Kinahan; Tristan Giesa; Joyce Y Wong; David L Kaplan; Markus J Buehler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Strategies for directing the structure and function of three-dimensional collagen biomaterials across length scales.

Authors:  B D Walters; J P Stegemann
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Designing silk-silk protein alloy materials for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Solomon Duki; Joseph Forys; Jeffrey Hettinger; Justin Buchicchio; Tabbetha Dobbins; Catherine Yang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Natural and Genetically Engineered Proteins for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Sílvia Gomes; Isabel B Leonor; João F Mano; Rui L Reis; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 29.190

9.  The effect of sterilization on silk fibroin biomaterial properties.

Authors:  Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Teresa M DesRochers; Kelly A Burke; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.979

10.  A biologically active sequence of the laminin alpha2 large globular 1 domain promotes cell adhesion through syndecan-1 by inducing phosphorylation and membrane localization of protein kinase Cdelta.

Authors:  Sung Youn Jung; Jin-Man Kim; Hyun Ki Kang; Da Hyun Jang; Byung-Moo Min
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.