UNLABELLED: The assessment of patient satisfaction using mailed questionnaires is an established method of quality management in acute care hospitals in our health care system. The needs of aged patients and the inter-professional approach of geriatric medicine are, however, not taken into account by such surveys. To date, validated German instruments to assess patient opinions in geriatric in-hospital care are rare. We report the results of a multi-center feasibility study of a questionnaire developed especially for such needs. We examined 1918 patients with a median age of 82 years and a mean Mini- Mental Score (MMS) of 25 points in 3 Swiss geriatric hospitals. We examined the results of all completed written questionnaires for their psychometric properties. In parallel, we assessed the satisfaction of the patient's spouses or family members applying the same instrument. The return rate was 32% when the instrument was applied as a questionnaire and 60% when applied as an interview. In questionnaires, the return rate was dependent on cognition with lower return in patients with low MMS scores. The return rate of questionnaires mailed to family members was 35%. The theoretical construct patient satisfaction was reliable and valid. The Cronbach-Alpha values in different item areas ranked between 0.67 (hotel services, room quality) and 0.92 (physicians). We were not able to assess the quality of medical therapies and of pain treatment due to low answer frequencies. Overall, patients were satisfied with all medical services in the participating hospitals. In contrast, satisfaction was low in family members regarding the quality of information flow between family members and physicians or nurses. CONCLUSIONS: An instrument to assess patient opinions can easily be introduced into a geriatric hospital. Such an instrument can provide important information for the improvement of quality in different areas of geriatric care such as medical, nursing care or guest services.
UNLABELLED: The assessment of patient satisfaction using mailed questionnaires is an established method of quality management in acute care hospitals in our health care system. The needs of aged patients and the inter-professional approach of geriatric medicine are, however, not taken into account by such surveys. To date, validated German instruments to assess patient opinions in geriatric in-hospital care are rare. We report the results of a multi-center feasibility study of a questionnaire developed especially for such needs. We examined 1918 patients with a median age of 82 years and a mean Mini- Mental Score (MMS) of 25 points in 3 Swiss geriatric hospitals. We examined the results of all completed written questionnaires for their psychometric properties. In parallel, we assessed the satisfaction of the patient's spouses or family members applying the same instrument. The return rate was 32% when the instrument was applied as a questionnaire and 60% when applied as an interview. In questionnaires, the return rate was dependent on cognition with lower return in patients with low MMS scores. The return rate of questionnaires mailed to family members was 35%. The theoretical construct patient satisfaction was reliable and valid. The Cronbach-Alpha values in different item areas ranked between 0.67 (hotel services, room quality) and 0.92 (physicians). We were not able to assess the quality of medical therapies and of pain treatment due to low answer frequencies. Overall, patients were satisfied with all medical services in the participating hospitals. In contrast, satisfaction was low in family members regarding the quality of information flow between family members and physicians or nurses. CONCLUSIONS: An instrument to assess patient opinions can easily be introduced into a geriatric hospital. Such an instrument can provide important information for the improvement of quality in different areas of geriatric care such as medical, nursing care or guest services.
Authors: Margaret S Van De Water; Michael Kutner; Patricia A Parmelee; Theodore Johnson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Hesham Al-Khashan; Adel Mishriky; Mohei Selim; Abdalla El Sheikh; Abdulaziz A BinSaeed Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.526