OBJECTIVE: Very little is known about the ability of physicians to assess oral health of geriatric patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the in ter-examiner reliability in assessment of oral health for a dentist and a physician, and to evaluate the influence of training in dental findings for the physician on inter- examiner reliability. METHODS: Inter-examiner reliability between a physician and a dentist was tested in a primary geriatric hospital with 126 participants 60 years old or more (mean 77 years; 32% men) using the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG) and additional items relating to caries and dentures (14 items). Calculated were kappa-coefficients, and percentage agreement between the examiners before (n = 50) and after (n = 51) training for the physician in dentistry (n = 25 for the common training session). RESULTS: Before the training both kappa-values and percentage agreement were not acceptable in the different categories. After the training, with the exception of the categories swallow and tongue, the reliability of all items was moderate or good. The number of occasions on which the physician underestimated the clinical finding compared to the dentist - indicating a clinical finding was overlooked - decreased for every item; for retention of denture and decayed teeth this decrease was significant. CONCLUSION: Screening for oral health performed by a physician was insufficient regarding the different clinical aspects. Training in the use of an oral health assessment tool improved the reliability of the screening. Because of the low number of examiners the results should be interpreted as a pilot investigation on this new topic.
OBJECTIVE: Very little is known about the ability of physicians to assess oral health of geriatric patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the in ter-examiner reliability in assessment of oral health for a dentist and a physician, and to evaluate the influence of training in dental findings for the physician on inter- examiner reliability. METHODS: Inter-examiner reliability between a physician and a dentist was tested in a primary geriatric hospital with 126 participants 60 years old or more (mean 77 years; 32% men) using the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG) and additional items relating to caries and dentures (14 items). Calculated were kappa-coefficients, and percentage agreement between the examiners before (n = 50) and after (n = 51) training for the physician in dentistry (n = 25 for the common training session). RESULTS: Before the training both kappa-values and percentage agreement were not acceptable in the different categories. After the training, with the exception of the categories swallow and tongue, the reliability of all items was moderate or good. The number of occasions on which the physician underestimated the clinical finding compared to the dentist - indicating a clinical finding was overlooked - decreased for every item; for retention of denture and decayed teeth this decrease was significant. CONCLUSION: Screening for oral health performed by a physician was insufficient regarding the different clinical aspects. Training in the use of an oral health assessment tool improved the reliability of the screening. Because of the low number of examiners the results should be interpreted as a pilot investigation on this new topic.
Authors: Andreas Zenthöfer; Peter Rammelsberg; Tomas Cabrera; Alexander Jochen Hassel Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Andreas Zenthöfer; Inga Meyer-Kühling; Anna-Luisa Hufeland; Johannes Schröder; Tomas Cabrera; Dominik Baumgart; Peter Rammelsberg; Alexander J Hassel Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 4.458