Literature DB >> 18327615

Developmental instability in a stem-mining sawfly: can fluctuating asymmetry detect plant host stress in a model system?

Héctor A Cárcamo1, Kevin D Floate, Byron L Lee, Brian L Beres, Fran R Clarke.   

Abstract

Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) may be a sensitive indicator of the stress experienced by organisms during their development. Its use in this manner is an intuitively appealing, frequently proposed, and potentially powerful tool but remains controversial partially because its underlying premise rarely has been critically tested. Such tests should include direct comparisons among individuals for which levels of FA, stress and fitness have been unambiguously quantified. We assessed the use of FA as a bioindicator of the stress experienced during egg-to-adult development by the stem-mining sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton. Sawflies were reared in a common garden from seven different wheat cultivars, which were selected to represent a gradient of stem solidness, a key factor imposing stress on sawflies during development. In this model system, stress was quantified by the weight of emergent adults. Fitness was quantified by counting the number of eggs in dissected females, which emerge with their full lifetime complement. FA was measured for wing length, three wing cells, and three wing veins using image analyses. The greatest amount of stress was induced by solid-stemmed cultivars from which the adults were significantly smaller than those developing in hollow-stemmed hosts. In turn, adult weight was positively correlated with fitness. The net effect was a 25-fold variation in sawfly fitness, which gave a reasonable expectation that FA levels would differ across cultivars. However, FA levels of all the traits were similar among cultivars and there was no negative relationship between FA and fitness. These results: (1) document the failure of FA as an indicator of stress in this model system, (2) identify adult weight as a satisfactory indicator of plant-induced stress and sawfly fitness, and (3) add to the growing body of literature questioning the value of FA as a biomonitor tool of developmental stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327615     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1009-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  What does sexual trait FA tell us about stress?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Lack of response to selection for lower fluctuating asymmetry of mutant eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  C J Breuker; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Developmental stability and fitness: a review.

Authors:  A P Møller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Developmental stability and fitness: the evidence is not quite so clear.

Authors:  G M Clarke
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to indices of quality and fitness in the damselfly, Enallagmaebrium (Hagen).

Authors:  Brian Leung; Mark R Forbes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tarsal asymmetry, nutritional condition, and survival in water boatmen (Callicorixa Vulnerata).

Authors:  P Nosil; T E Reimchen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.694

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Biotic and abiotic factors affecting Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and the associated hyperparasitoid Alloxysta fuscicornis Hartig (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) morphologies.

Authors:  K C F L Souto; M V Sampaio; H L Pedroso; C Lomônaco
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.